UN Presses Companies to End Greenwashing and Take Real Climate Action
The United Nations calls for stricter standards and transparency to combat greenwashing and drive genuine climate progress in the corporate world.

The climate crisis has reached a critical point, and the gap between corporate promises and actual progress on sustainability is a growing concern. In a bold declaration, the United Nations has urged businesses and investors worldwide to stop greenwashing—misleading claims that create a false impression of environmental progress—and instead adopt transparent, science-based standards for climate action.
What Is Greenwashing?
Greenwashing occurs when companies exaggerate, misrepresent, or fabricate their environmental or social responsibility, misleading customers, investors, and regulators. This practice undermines genuine efforts to address climate change by creating confusion, eroding trust, and slowing down real progress. Common tactics include:
- Using vague or unverifiable sustainability claims
- Highlighting minor green achievements while ignoring major environmental harms
- Creating misleading branding or advertising that suggests products are more eco-friendly than they are
- Promoting future-oriented goals without actionable short-term targets or transparent reporting
Why the UN Issued This Warning
In November 2022, during the UN Climate Change Conference (COP27), the United Nations released a decisive report highlighting the prevalence of greenwashing among major corporations and financial institutions. The report asserts that voluntary pledges and vague commitments are not enough—they must be underpinned by credible, science-based action and rigorous third-party monitoring. Without this, greenwashing will continue to delay the necessary decarbonization of economies and global climate efforts.
The UN High-Level Expert Group on the Net-Zero Emissions Commitments of Non-State Entities found that too many companies make bold climate claims without real plans or transparency. The group’s report, called Integrity Matters, sets out specific recommendations to help end deceptive sustainability practices and guide credible climate leadership in the private sector.
Key Recommendations from the UN for Ending Greenwashing
The UN’s approach to combatting greenwashing is clear. Companies must:
- Set Short and Long-Term Targets: Goals should align with science-based pathways, including interim emissions targets for 2025 and 2030, not just distant net-zero promises for 2050.
- Disclose Data Publicly: All climate actions and progress should be transparently reported and independently verified.
- Cover Value Chains: Companies must account for all emissions, including those from suppliers and users of their products (Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions).
- Avoid Offsets as a Substitute: Offsets should only be used for hard-to-abate emissions, not as a replacement for actual reductions.
- End Involvement in Fossil Fuel Expansion: No investment or support for developing new fossil fuel reserves or infrastructure.
- Align Lobbying and Advertising: Marketing, advocacy, and financing should consistently reflect genuine climate commitments and not undermine them.
Why Greenwashing Is Harmful
Greenwashing is not a harmless marketing tactic—it distracts from meaningful action and erodes public trust. Some key dangers include:
- Delaying Action: Companies may continue unsustainable practices under the guise of progress.
- Deceiving Customers: Consumers may unknowingly support products or brands that are not aligned with their values.
- Confusing Investors and Regulators: Difficulties in distinguishing genuine sustainability initiatives from empty claims can distort investment and hinder regulation.
- Undermining Global Climate Goals: Greenwashing hinders the collective effort required to limit global warming to 1.5°C.
Corporate Pledges Under Scrutiny
According to the UN, more than 8,300 businesses across the globe have made net-zero commitments under initiatives like the Race to Zero campaign. However, a substantial proportion of these are criticized for their lack of transparency and robust action. Recent reports have shown that many companies fail to:
- Set credible, measurable short-term emissions reduction goals
- Report on progress in a comprehensive and auditable way
- Avoid heavy reliance on carbon offsets or unproven technologies
- Stop supporting new fossil fuel expansion directly or indirectly
An evaluation by independent organizations found a disconnect between bold statements and the reality of slow, marginal action. Failure to align business strategies and investments with stated climate goals leads to accusations of hypocrisy, prompting mounting criticism from civil society, investors, and the scientific community.
Examples of Greenwashing in Practice
Several high-profile examples highlight the scale of greenwashing in the corporate sector:
- Tech and Electronics: Companies tout the use of recycled materials in products while supply chains remain dependent on fossil fuels or exploitative labor practices.
- Retail and Fashion: Brands launch “sustainable” collections that represent a tiny fraction of their total offerings, without addressing the environmental impact of fast fashion.
- Finance: Major banks and funds announce restrictions on coal or oil investments, yet continue to finance fossil fuel expansion through loopholes.
- Consumer Goods: Products claim recyclable or biodegradable packaging, even when local recycling systems cannot process them or the claims are unverifiable.
The Role of Standards and Accountability
The UN’s Integrity Matters report urges the global community to move beyond voluntary action and self-regulation. To restore trust and accelerate real progress, it recommends:
- Adopting Credible Reporting Standards: Use of internationally recognized protocols for measuring and disclosing emissions, such as the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
- Third-Party Verification: Independent auditing of climate-related claims and progress reports.
- Public Disclosure: Full publication of targets, methodologies, and results, allowing stakeholders to evaluate company performance.
- Government Regulation: National and international authorities must introduce comprehensive rules to define, monitor, and penalize greenwashing.
UN’s Checklist for Net-Zero Claims
To help companies and financial entities align with best practices, the UN published a checklist covering:
- Setting near-term and longer-term goals
- Ensuring claims cover all emissions (Scopes 1, 2, and 3)
- Including both reduction and adaptation strategies
- Disclosing progress annually with independent review
- Phasing out coal, oil, or gas without exceptions
- Stopping greenwashing in branding, lobbying, and finance
Major Challenges in Combating Greenwashing
Despite increasing scrutiny, many challenges remain:
- Complex Supply Chains: Global, multi-tiered supply networks make it difficult to track and verify emissions and environmental impact.
- Lack of Enforcement: In many countries, weak regulations and limited resources hinder enforcement against greenwashing.
- Fragmented Standards: Different regions use different definitions and methodologies, complicating comparisons and accountability.
- Corporate Resistance: Some businesses resist publishing detailed data, fearing reputational or financial risks.
The Evolving Regulatory Landscape
Momentum is growing among governments and industry regulators to clamp down on misleading sustainability claims. Recent measures include:
- Stricter Advertising Rules: Jurisdictions like the UK, Australia, and the EU have introduced or updated guidelines to prohibit misleading environmental ads.
- Mandatory Disclosure Regulations: Some countries now require large companies to report carbon emissions, energy use, and progress towards targets in standardized formats.
- Penalties and Fines: Regulators have levied fines and sanctions for egregious cases of greenwashing, sending a clear message to the private sector.
Best Practices for Businesses
To avoid greenwashing and demonstrate genuine climate leadership, the UN and sustainability experts recommend that companies:
- Set transparent, science-based targets aligned with the Paris Agreement
- Appoint accountable leadership for sustainability strategy
- Regularly publish independent, verified progress reports
- Integrate climate action into core business operations and decision making
- Promote a culture of honesty, improvement, and stakeholder engagement
Table: Greenwashing vs. Genuine Sustainability
Greenwashing | Genuine Sustainability Action |
---|---|
Vague or unverified environmental claims | Third-party verified data and clear reporting |
Reliance on offsets without reducing own emissions | Direct reduction of emissions across all operations |
Highlighting minor or selective achievements | Comprehensive strategies tackling the full value chain |
Marketing eco-friendly image, not backed by action | Consistent alignment between action, advocacy, and finance |
Commitments with no clear timeframe or accountability | Time-bound targets, regular, and public updates |
How Consumers and Investors Can Respond
- Ask companies for specific, measurable evidence of environmental progress
- Seek independent verification of claims or certifications
- Be wary of sweeping commitments lacking short-term goals or regular reporting
- Support businesses that integrate sustainability into their products and operations, not just their marketing
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between net-zero and carbon neutral?
Net-zero means a company or country reduces emissions as much as possible and balances any remaining emissions with removals; carbon neutral often refers to offsetting rather than direct reductions, and can be less stringent.
Why is it important for companies to cover Scope 3 emissions?
Scope 3 emissions include indirect emissions from a company’s value chain, such as suppliers and product use; they often account for the majority of a company’s climate impact and are essential to include for true transparency.
How can I spot greenwashing when choosing products or brands?
Look for evidence: verified third-party certifications, full transparency, specific actions and timelines, not just generalized environmental claims or imagery.
What action is the UN taking next to ensure corporate accountability?
The UN is developing frameworks for ongoing monitoring, rolling out detailed checklists, and pushing for stricter international standards to make greenwashing more difficult and improve public trust in corporate action.
What should genuine sustainability leadership look like in the corporate world?
It means integrating climate and environmental targets into the core strategy, rigorous reporting on all activities, engaging transparently with stakeholders, and consistently aligning lobbying and investments with stated climate commitments.
References
- https://cwrrr.org/opinions/22-brands-called-out-for-greenwashing-in-2023/
- https://thesustainableagency.com/blog/greenwashing-examples/
- https://erb.umich.edu/2023/10/26/report-greenwashing-3-0/
- https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2023/02/13/not-zero-new-report-exposes-greenwashing-in-climate-plans-of-top-global-corporations/
- https://influencemap.org/briefing/The-State-of-Net-Zero-Greenwash-24402
- https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/greenwashing
- https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/high-level-expert-group/updates
- https://zerocarbon-analytics.org/policy/how-to-spot-greenwashing-in-a-sustainability-report-a-guide-to-spotting-false-environmental-claims/
- https://www.reprisk.com/research-insights/reports/on-the-rise-navigating-the-wave-of-greenwashing-and-social-washing/20adb3d8
- https://www.iatp.org/climate-action-versus-corporate-greenwashing-un-climate-summit
Read full bio of medha deb