The Total Carbon Footprint of the North American Home: Understanding, Measurement, and Reduction Strategies
Assessing and lowering the carbon emissions of residential construction for a more sustainable future in North America.
The Carbon Footprint of North American Homes: An Overview
North American homes represent a significant source of carbon emissions, stemming from both the materials used in construction and the energy required throughout their lifecycle. As climate change initiatives intensify, a deeper understanding of these emissions is essential for homeowners, builders, and policymakers aiming to reduce the sector’s environmental impact and contribute to global climate targets.
Understanding Carbon Footprint in the Residential Sector
The carbon footprint of a home encompasses all greenhouse gas emissions arising from two main sources:
- Embodied (Upfront) Emissions: These consist of emissions generated throughout the extraction, manufacturing, transportation, and assembly of construction materials.
- Operational Emissions: This includes the ongoing emissions from electricity and fuel use for heating, cooling, lighting, and appliances during the home’s life.
Recent studies highlight that both components are substantial, with new home construction alone adding over 50 million tons of embodied carbon emissions annually in the US, a figure comparable to the yearly output of entire countries such as Norway or Peru.
Embodied Carbon: Upfront Impact of Home Construction
Embodied carbon refers to the greenhouse gases released during material production, transport, and home assembly. Key findings from recent research include:
- Cradle-to-Gate (CtG) Emissions: The average CtG embodied emissions for new homes hover between 150–210 kg CO2e/m2 of conditioned floor area.
- A study of 921 model homes across the US, Canada, and Europe found an average CtG embodied carbon of 184 kg CO2e/m2.
- At current construction rates, structure, enclosure, and partition emissions may total 26–39 million tons CO2e annually in the US alone.
- For the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, new home construction annually emits around 1.75 Mt (megatonnes) CO2e, equating to the emissions of more than 183,000 cars.
- Townhouses typically have the lowest total emissions, while single detached homes have the highest, primarily due to their size.
Embodied Carbon by Material Type
- Concrete: A leading contributor to emissions due to its fossil fuel-intensive production process.
- Insulation: While critical for operational efficiency, many insulation types have a high embodied footprint.
- Cladding & Interior Finishes: These also add substantially to the total footprint, often overlooked in standard assessments.
Altogether, these material categories represent over 70% of the total emissions from home construction.
Operational Emissions: Life Cycle Energy Use
Operational emissions account for the greenhouse gases produced from using energy in the home after construction. Key insights on operational emissions include:
- From 2013 to 2021, aggregate CO2 emissions from US homes dropped by 8.8% even as the single-family housing stock increased by 7.3%.
- Emissions from electricity use declined by 13.6%, largely due to cleaner energy sources, while natural gas emissions for heating increased by 3.6%.
- The overall reduction in carbon intensity is primarily attributed to improvements in power generation, rather than property-level upgrades or house design changes.
- Wealthier households, with larger homes and higher energy demand, generate approximately 25% more greenhouse gases than lower-income homes.
What others are reading
Comparing Embodied and Operational Emissions
| Emission Type | Main Sources | Reduction Potential | Current Trends |
|---|---|---|---|
| Embodied Carbon | Materials (concrete, insulation, finishes) | 30–50% with available material swaps | Growing attention; still high |
| Operational Carbon | Electricity, heating, appliances | Strong downtrend via clean energy | Declining overall |
Best Practices and Immediate Reduction Strategies
Mitigating the carbon footprint of North American homes can be fast, practical, and even cost-effective by focusing on both embodied and operational emissions. Immediate steps for builders, designers, and homeowners include:
- Opt for Low-Emitting Materials: Swapping high-carbon materials for alternatives such as recycled steel, low-carbon concrete, cellulose insulation, and sustainably sourced wood can cut embodied emissions by up to 50%.
- Use Carbon-Storing Products: Selecting building materials that sequester carbon (like certain wood products and natural fiber insulations) can yield up to 140% reductions when maximized.
- Downsize Homes: Reducing the average home size significantly lowers both embodied and operational emissions, as larger homes require more materials and energy.
- Upgrade Energy Systems: Implementing efficient heat pumps, solar panels, and smart controls further decreases operational emissions.
- Electrify Heating: Transitioning from natural gas to electricity for heating is essential, as it pairs with the greening electricity grid for larger emission drops.
With intentional design and material choice, it’s entirely possible to construct homes that are energy-efficient, healthy, comfortable, and low-emission from both an operational and embodied standpoint.
Challenges and Opportunities
Despite progress, several obstacles remain:
- Lack of Material Data: Builders often lack precise information about the embodied emissions of products, complicating decision-making.
- Industry Standards: Most building codes and certification systems still focus on energy use rather than full life cycle emissions.
- Limited Policy Support: Incentives for low-embodied carbon construction are modest, but growing attention may soon change this.
- Consumer Awareness: Few buyers currently consider embodied carbon in purchasing decisions, limiting market demand for greener homes.
Nonetheless, the sector stands at a pivotal point; immediate action using the available tools and materials can sharply reduce emissions at scale.
Future Outlook: Toward Negative Emissions Homes?
Emerging research presents the prospect of negative emissions homes, which actively sequester more carbon than their lifecycle releases. Achieving this vision requires:
- Broad adoption of carbon-storing products for structure, surfaces, and insulation.
- Integration of renewable energy for operational needs.
- Ongoing innovation in building methods and materials.
While not yet the norm, several projects and pilot homes demonstrate that this approach is technically achievable and economically viable, foreshadowing broader adoption in the coming decades.
How Does a Home’s Carbon Footprint Compare Regionally?
Carbon emissions vary by region and housing type:
- Canadian homes show an average embodied carbon impact of 40 tons per unit, though values fluctuate widely based on typology.
- Material emissions often exceed those from residential waste and agriculture, underscoring their significance within total regional GHGs.
- Single detached homes contribute most due to larger square footage, while townhouses and multifamily units tend to have lower footprints per occupant.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: What is ’embodied carbon’ in home construction?
A: Embodied carbon refers to the greenhouse gases released in creating and assembling building materials, including extraction, manufacturing, transport, and construction processes.
Q: How can homeowners or builders reduce their home’s carbon footprint?
A: They can select low-emission or carbon-storing materials, ensure energy-efficient design and appliances, electrify heating where feasible, and consider building smaller homes.
Q: Are large homes always worse for the climate?
A: Generally, yes. Larger homes consume more materials during construction and more energy during occupancy, resulting in higher overall emissions.
Q: What are the most impactful materials to change for emission reduction?
A: Concrete, insulation, cladding, and interior finishes are key; targeting these offers the greatest carbon savings.
Q: Can new homes be built to have net negative carbon emissions?
A: While not widespread, using carbon-storing materials and renewable energy systems can produce homes that sequester more carbon than they emit over their lifespan.
Conclusion: A Path Forward for Greener Homes
Residential construction represents both a significant climate challenge and a unique opportunity. By understanding the sources of emissions, choosing greener materials, and embracing energy-efficient practices, North American homes can play a proactive role in reducing the continent’s climate impact. Widespread adoption of best practices, supported by policy and consumer demand, is essential for the transition to truly sustainable housing.
References
- https://www.buildersforclimateaction.org/uploads/1/5/9/3/15931000/bfca_pbc-embarc_report-web.pdf
- https://www.fhfa.gov/research/papers/wp2405
- https://rmi.org/insight/hidden-climate-impact-of-residential-construction/
- https://news.umich.edu/homes-of-wealthy-americans-have-carbon-footprints-25-higher-than-lower-income-residences/
- https://www.nature.org/en-us/get-involved/how-to-help/carbon-footprint-calculator/
- https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks
- https://www.greenamerica.org/all-media-mentions-report?field_relevant_lens_target_id=&page=2&order=nid&sort=desc
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
