How Tariffs on Canadian Aluminum Hurt the Climate and Economy
Tariffs on Canadian aluminum disrupt clean energy, threaten climate goals, and reshape North American industry.
Aluminum is a fundamental material for the modern economy—touching everything from automobiles and beverage cans to the latest clean energy technologies. Recent tariffs by the United States government on Canadian aluminum are not only impacting local businesses and consumers, but are also undermining climate action at a time when a rapid transition to low-carbon solutions is urgent.
Canadian Aluminum: Backbone of North American Industry
Canada is the largest foreign supplier of aluminum for the United States, providing roughly three-fifths of its total aluminum imports. This longstanding trade relationship has enabled North America to meet manufacturing demand reliably and at competitive prices.
- Aluminum is critical to sectors such as electric vehicles (EVs), solar panels, wind turbines, and grid infrastructure.
- The energy required to produce Canadian aluminum is largely hydroelectric—making it far less carbon-intensive compared to most competitors.
- The downstream North American supply chain is deeply integrated: one Canadian smelter job supports about 13 U.S. manufacturing jobs.
Tariff Introduction: Scope and Motivation
On March 12, 2025, a 25% tariff on Canadian aluminum imports, increased from a previous 10%, went into effect via Section 232 of the U.S. Trade Expansion Act. Although initially justified on national security grounds, critics argue the real effect is to protect declining domestic smelters in the U.S.
- The Trump administration doubled tariffs, bringing costs for Canadian exporters to unprecedented levels.
- Reciprocal tariffs from Canada followed, further tightening trade.
Why Aluminum Tariffs Matter
Aluminum’s importance is twofold:
- It is a strategic resource for renewable energy buildouts—used across vehicles, transmission lines, batteries, and more.
- Canadian aluminum’s low carbon footprint supports climate objectives across North America.
Economic Impacts: What Happens When Tariffs Rise?
Tariffs have direct and indirect consequences for manufacturers, businesses, and consumers.
- Increased Costs: U.S. manufacturers now pay 25-50% more for aluminum, driving up production costs for downstream goods.
- Declining Competitiveness: Higher prices make it harder for American goods to compete internationally, threatening jobs.
- Business Uncertainty: Contract cancellations, price volatility, and supply chain disruptions are prevalent. Canadian companies face new challenges securing U.S. contracts and planning for future investments.
According to industry executives, “these tariffs are hugely disruptive.” Firms are now resorting to cost-optimization and exploring alternative markets to offset losses.
Expanded Tariffs and Challenges for Canada’s Steel and Aluminum Industries
The 2025 tariffs differ significantly from earlier measures. Key changes include:
What others are reading
- The increase from 10% to 25%, then doubling to 50% on some products.
- Elimination of alternative arrangements and exclusions that existed before.
- Tariffs now affecting downstream products, such as nails and bolts made with aluminum.
- Potential “stacking” of tariffs, where steel and aluminum tariffs add atop country-based import taxes.
This means not only raw materials but also finished goods face steep barriers, rippling through entire industries—from automotive to construction.
Climate Costs: Clean Energy Under Threat
Perhaps the greatest long-term consequence of these tariffs is their effect on climate action. Canadian aluminum is among the cleanest in the world, thanks to abundant hydroelectricity. In contrast, many U.S. or foreign aluminum producers rely on coal or natural gas, resulting in much higher carbon emissions.
- Clean Energy Supply Chain: Aluminum is vital for solar panels, wind turbines, EVs, and transmission lines. Tariffs inflate costs for all these technologies, slowing adoption.
- Carbon Leakage: Purchasing more aluminum from countries with dirtier energy mixes could increase overall emissions.
- Lost Opportunity: The U.S. needs massive quantities of aluminum over the next several decades, but domestic capacity cannot meet demand—importing clean Canadian aluminum is a climate solution.
Table: Comparing Carbon Emissions of Aluminum Production
| Source | Energy Mix | CO₂ Emissions (per ton) |
|---|---|---|
| Canadian Smelters | Hydroelectric | ~2-4 tons |
| United States | Mixed (coal, gas, hydro) | ~6-16 tons |
| Chinese Smelters | Predominantly Coal | ~16-20+ tons |
Switching supply away from Canada due to tariffs can raise average carbon intensity for North America’s infrastructure investments.
Broader Policy Impacts: Energy Transition and Job Creation
Beyond just price and emissions, tariffs are making the shift to clean energy more difficult.
- Tariffs hamper the ability to build more EVs, power grids, renewables, and climate-resilient infrastructure.
- They threaten thousands of jobs in both Canada and the United States that depend on an integrated aluminum supply chain.
- The policy uncertainty is causing delayed investments and stifling business planning for the future.
The Aluminum Association notes that, “in the years, if not decades, it takes to build new U.S. smelter capacity, our metal needs must be met by importing.” Without Canadian imports, the transition to cleaner manufacturing could stall.
Industry Response and Recommendations
- Trade Groups Oppose Tariffs: The U.S. aluminum industry and organized labor—such as the United Steelworkers—largely oppose tariffs targeting Canadian aluminum. They note that “Canada is not the problem” and urge distinction between trusted partners and unfair competitors.
- Call for Certainty: Industry leaders demand more predictable trade policies to facilitate investment and growth.
- Policy Recommendations:
- Seek negotiated exemptions for Canadian aluminum to encourage clean supply chains.
- Revisit tariff levels and scope to support climate, manufacturing, and job goals.
- Prioritize the integration of clean, reliable materials in future industrial and energy strategy.
Experts warn that protectionist measures driven by short-term domestic politics can undermine longer-term strategic interests.
Ways Forward: Navigating Tariff Challenges
Canadian exporters are adjusting by optimizing costs, exploring new international markets, and using financial risk mitigation tools like credit insurance. Governments and companies must continually adapt to changing geopolitical pressures.
- Firms seek new customers abroad in response to contract losses in the U.S.
- Organizations such as Export Development Canada (EDC) advise on managing cash flow under uncertainty.
- Both countries must safeguard critical supply chains for clean materials and climate action.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Why is Canadian aluminum cleaner than most alternatives?
A: Canada’s aluminum industry primarily uses hydroelectric power, which produces significantly fewer carbon emissions compared to coal- or gas-powered smelting commonly found in other countries.
Q: Who pays for the tariffs?
A: U.S. manufacturers and consumers pay higher prices on aluminum products, with costs passed down the supply chain.
Q: Will tariffs on Canadian aluminum benefit U.S. aluminum producers?
A: While some domestic smelters may see marginal gains, the U.S. industry cannot meet national demand alone, so the broader manufacturing sector faces increased costs and job risk.
Q: How do these tariffs affect climate goals?
A: Tariffs discourage the use of cleaner Canadian aluminum, increase costs for renewable energy infrastructure, and could lead to a rise in global emissions by driving purchases from countries with dirtier energy mixes.
Q: What can businesses do to adapt?
A: Companies are optimizing costs, seeking new markets outside the U.S., and using credit insurance to mitigate payment risks. Policy advocacy is also ongoing to reduce tariff burdens.
Key Takeaways
- Canadian aluminum is vital for the U.S. clean energy transition, manufacturing competitiveness, and climate goals.
- Tariffs raise prices, disrupt supply chains, create business uncertainty, and undermine climate action.
- Industry groups and economists widely oppose tariffs targeting Canadian aluminum, citing mutual benefits and climate leadership.
- Policy solutions should focus on strengthening North American integration of clean, reliable materials to meet both climate and economic targets.
References
- https://trellis.net/article/trump-tariffs-threaten-canadian-aluminum-supplies-critical-to-the-energy-transition/
- https://www.aluminum.org/news/us-aluminum-industry-responds-232-implementation-calls-certainty-tariff-landscape
- https://www.rbc.com/en/thought-leadership/economics/featured-insights/how-u-s-steel-and-aluminum-tariffs-would-impact-canadas-economy/
- https://www.edc.ca/en/blog/us-steel-and-aluminum-tariffs.html
- https://www.doanegrantthornton.ca/insights/how-new-tariffs-could-affect-canadian-businesses/
- https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/the-impact-of-trump-tariffs-on-us-canada-minerals-and-metals-trade/
- https://www.cfr.org/article/trumps-new-aluminum-and-steel-tariffs-explained-six-charts
- https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/global-research/current-events/us-tariffs
- https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/programs/international-trade-finance-policy/canadas-response-us-tariffs.html
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
