How Supermarkets Are Tackling Emissions: Reducing, Offsetting, and Innovating in the Race to Net Zero
As supermarkets confront climate change, they are reducing emissions, offsetting the rest, and reshaping how food reaches shelves.
Supermarkets and Climate Change: A Balancing Act
Supermarkets have emerged as pivotal players in the fight against climate change, given their unique position at the heart of the global food system. With sprawling operations, intricate supply chains, and millions of customers, their impact on greenhouse gas emissions is immense. Today’s top supermarkets are actively working to shrink their carbon footprints through operational innovation, supply chain transformation, and strategic carbon offsets. Yet, progress is uneven, and significant barriers remain, especially in the race to reach net zero emissions.
Understanding Supermarket Emissions
Most supermarket emissions come from two main sources:
- Direct operations: Energy use, refrigeration, transportation, waste management.
- Indirect emissions: Supply chains, product sourcing (especially meat, dairy, produce), and agriculture.
According to recent assessments, about 85–90% of a supermarket’s overall climate footprint comes not from the store itself, but from the extended networks of suppliers and agricultural producers.
Refrigerants: The ‘Invisible’ Climate Culprit
One of the most potent – yet often overlooked – sources of emissions in supermarkets is refrigerant leakage. Refrigeration systems rely heavily on hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), which are powerful greenhouse gases. These chemicals, snaking through miles of pipes in every store, can be up to 4,000 times more impactful than carbon dioxide in warming the planet.
- The average American supermarket may leak up to 25% of its refrigerants annually.
- Leaks of HFCs from a single store can equal the CO2 emissions from about 300 cars each year.
Supermarkets like Aldi, Walmart, and Albertsons are making progress by switching to natural refrigerants like ammonia, CO2, and propane, which have drastically lower global warming potential (GWP):
| Refrigerant | Global Warming Potential (GWP) |
|---|---|
| CO2 | 1 |
| Ammonia | 0 |
| Propane | 3 |
| Fluoroform (HFC-23) | 14,800 |
- Aldi leads with more than 590 stores using near-zero GWP refrigerants and has pledged all U.S. stores will follow by 2035.
- Walmart plans to transition all cooling systems to low-impact refrigerants by 2040, after remediation efforts began following leak findings.
- Albertsons aims for a 47% carbon reduction by 2030 and net zero by 2040, with a growing number of stores adopting lower-GWP systems.
Net Zero Goals: Setting Targets and Facing Challenges
Global supermarket giants have recognized the urgency, but not all are equally committed. Recent data shows:
- Only 4 of the 10 largest supermarkets have formal net zero targets.
- Almost all have plans to reduce emissions from stores, vehicles, and depots, but only a minority have set longer-term targets for their products—which are the bulk of their climate footprint.
- Eight of ten supermarkets have pledged to eliminate deforestation from their supply chains, driven largely by regulatory and consumer pressure.
- Half of the largest supermarkets disclose key supply chain data; transparency is a major challenge.
A major issue is data visibility—many supermarkets lack reliable systems for tracking the origins, carbon footprint, and sustainability of every product on their shelves.
Barriers to Faster Progress
- Complex, opaque supply chains: Difficult to trace ingredients, verify practices, and report accurately.
- Deforestation: Eliminating forest loss is hampered by weak tracking, especially with global suppliers.
- Agricultural emissions: Scaling climate-smart farming is slow, as supermarkets rely on thousands of independent suppliers.
- Policy and consumer habits: Regulatory gaps and entrenched dietary patterns slow sector-wide progress.
What others are reading
Innovative Solutions: Collaboration, Data, and Agriculture
Supermarkets cannot reach net zero alone—they must collaborate with suppliers, sector peers, and governments. The Carbon Trust identifies three main pathways to accelerate change:
- Climate-smart agriculture: Supporting farmers in optimizing animal feed, reducing methane, adopting regenerative practices.
- Financial incentives: Paying premiums, offering low-interest loans, or early payments to encourage shifts to sustainable production.
- Shared data platforms: Pooling resources to track emissions, deforestation links, and the carbon intensity of products sector-wide.
- Collective policy advocacy: Lobbying for stronger regulations and supporting shifts in consumer behavior.
Offsetting Emissions: A Necessary Strategy
Even with strong efforts to cut emissions directly and indirectly, supermarkets are currently unable to fully eliminate their climate footprint. This is where carbon offsets come into play:
- Offsets allow supermarkets to invest in projects that remove or prevent equivalent emissions elsewhere (such as reforestation or renewable energy).
- While controversial, offsets are considered an important interim tool as companies phase out legacy emissions.
However, experts stress that offsets should never be a substitute for direct cuts. Nor should they be used for greenwashing. Instead, offsets must be:
- Transparent in sourcing and impact.
- Used only for unavoidable emissions.
- Part of a credible pathway to absolute net zero.
Supermarket Sector Case Studies
Several supermarket chains stand out for their leadership and innovation:
- Aldi
- 590+ stores with natural refrigerants, near zero GWP.
- Plans to convert all U.S. stores by 2035.
- Remodeling existing stores for climate impact.
- Walmart
- First U.S. store using CO2 opened in New York (2022).
- Goal: all stores, distribution centers, and data sites to use low-GWP refrigerants by 2040.
- Albertsons
- Launched Recipe for Change initiative.
- 85 stores transitioned to lower-GWP refrigerants.
- Net zero goal for 2040.
- Publix
- Piloting CO2 systems in multiple new stores.
- Gradual HFC phase-out underway.
Commercial Benefits and Future Trends
Moving towards net zero presents not only challenges, but also commercial opportunities:
- Future-proofing business against regulatory and market changes.
- Growing market for alternative proteins ($15 bn sector).
- Consumer demand for sustainable, healthier food choices.
- Potential for industry-wide collaboration to lower costs and accelerate change.
Simon Retallack, Carbon Trust Director, notes supermarkets’ unique position: “Supermarkets have a golden opportunity to use their influence to bring suppliers, customers and policymakers on board in the journey to Net Zero.”
Key Recommendations for Supermarkets
- Support food producers in adopting climate-smart agriculture.
- Enable and incentivize supply chain shifts with financial rewards.
- Develop digital platforms for tracking and sharing emissions data.
- Collaborate with sector peers to multiply impact.
- Advocate for policies that support climate goals and consumer shifts.
Sector leaders agree that transformational change depends on radical collaboration: “Working together… supermarkets can unlock a step change in progress, opening up opportunities a Net Zero economy offers, and developing a food system that is resilient for the future.”
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Why are refrigerants such a big climate concern in supermarkets?
A: Conventional refrigerants such as HFCs are thousands of times more potent than CO2 in driving global warming. Supermarket leaks account for significant emissions each year, making the switch to natural refrigerants essential for climate progress.
Q: How much of supermarket emissions come from their supply chains?
A: About 85–90% of overall supermarket greenhouse gas emissions originate in the supply chain, especially from agricultural production and product sourcing.
Q: What is the difference between net zero targets and short-term emission cuts?
A: Net zero targets commit supermarkets to eliminating or offsetting all emissions over time, often through a combination of direct cuts, supply chain improvements, and offsets. Short-term cuts typically focus only on operational improvements like store energy use and transport.
Q: Are carbon offsets a reliable solution for supermarket climate goals?
A: Offsets can help address unavoidable emissions but must be used transparently and as part of a broader, credible climate strategy. They should not substitute for actual cuts, and their effectiveness depends on third-party validation and proper management.
Q: How are supermarkets encouraging sustainable habits among customers?
A: Some supermarkets promote net zero-aligned consumption by offering more plant-based products, transparent carbon labeling, and actively educating customers about climate impacts of food choices.
Conclusion: Building a Resilient Food Future
Supermarkets sit at the crossroads of sustainability, consumer health, and commercial innovation. By rapidly advancing low-impact refrigerants, collaborating for supply chain transparency, supporting sustainable agriculture, and using offsets responsibly, they are charting a difficult but essential path toward net zero. The sector’s ultimate success requires unity among competitors, suppliers, and governments—unlocking a resilient food system for both people and planet.
References
- https://www.carbontrust.com/news-and-insights/news/transformational-change-needed-to-address-supermarkets-farm-to-fork-climate-impact-with-only-four-of-top-10-setting-net-zero-targets
- https://trellis.net/article/supermarkets-are-tackling-emissions-their-freezer-aisles/
- https://worldcrunch.com/tech-science/carbon-offsetting-tree-hugger-dream-or-greenwashing-scam/
- https://ecooptimism.com/?tag=treehugger
- https://www.sweep.net/guides/the-business-guide-to-carbon-accounting-and-emission-reductions
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
