Retailers and the Cargo Shipping Crisis: Who Is Responsible?
Major retailers drive a global cargo shipping crisis—uncover who’s polluting, the scale of emissions, and the urgent shift to greener seas.
The massive scale of global retail means goods travel enormous distances from factories to consumers, most often carried across oceans by fossil-fueled cargo ships. While cargo shipping is crucial to the global supply chain, its environmental cost is staggering—and a handful of major retailers are responsible for a disproportionate share of pollution. What responsibility do these companies have, and what does the path to greener shipping look like?
How Retailers Became Major Polluters Through Cargo Shipping
For decades, many of the world’s top retailers have outsourced manufacturing and relied on vast ocean shipping networks to meet the relentless demand for consumer goods. This strategy—key to maintaining low prices and high product variety—has also resulted in a massive increase in fossil fuel-based shipping emissions.
To understand the scale, consider this: just the 15 biggest U.S.-based retailers—names like Walmart, Target, Amazon, Home Depot, and Ikea—were responsible for an estimated 12.7 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions from imports by sea into the U.S. in 2019 alone. That is equivalent to running three coal-fired power plants for one year or the annual energy usage of 1.5 million American homes.
The Numbers: Who’s Shipping, Who’s Polluting?
The study in focus systematically traced cargo manifests and ship emissions to pinpoint pollution back to each retailer. The findings paint a clear picture of disproportionate impact:
- Walmart: Responsible for 3.7 million metric tons of CO2—more than the annual output of most coal plants.
- Target: Accounted for 2.2 million metric tons of CO2. For perspective, this is more than the total emissions of the world’s 20 smallest, most climate-vulnerable countries combined.
- Ikea, Amazon, Home Depot, Nike, Samsung and others together made up the rest of the top 15 ocean importers steeped in fossil fuel-driven shipping emissions.
Every product delivered by these companies in 2019 was transported via fossil-fueled cargo ships. This means that, despite public-facing sustainability claims, ocean shipments remain among the dirtiest links in retailer supply chains.
| Retailer | Estimated CO2 Emissions (million metric tons, 2019) | Comparison/Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Walmart | 3.7 | Equal to a coal plant’s annual output |
| Target | 2.2 | Greater than 20 small nations’ emissions |
| Home Depot, Ikea, Amazon, Nike, Samsung, others | ~6.8 | Cumulative emissions of top 15 retailers |
| Total (Top 15) | 12.7 | 3 coal plants or 1.5 million homes |
Pollution Beyond Carbon: The Full Impact of Cargo Shipping
Cargo ship emissions encompass more than CO2. Burning low-quality fuel oil (‘bunker fuel’), shipping also releases:
- Sulfur oxide (SOx): These top 15 retailers generated 7.3 times more carcinogenic SOx than all U.S. road vehicles combined, contributing to acid rain and respiratory disease.
- Nitrogen oxides (NOx): Their shipping emissions matched the smog-producing NOx of 27.4 million cars and trucks, worsening air quality in port cities like Los Angeles and Long Beach.
- Particulate matter (PM2.5): Emissions were on par with the entire U.S. mining industry—PM2.5 specifically is linked to asthma, heart disease, and cancer.
These pollutants disproportionately impact port communities—often lower-income, minority neighborhoods—heightening environmental justice concerns.
Why Have Retailers Overlooked Maritime Emissions?
Many corporations have made ambitious climate pledges and highlight carbon reductions in operations or packaging. However, for most, emissions from the maritime supply chain are left out of their public sustainability reports. This creates a gap between the green image companies present and the hidden footprint of global shipping.
What others are reading
Experts warn that unless marine emissions are transparently measured and regulated, efforts to address climate change will be incomplete, and frontline communities will continue to suffer from pollution.
The Human Health Impact: More Than Just CO2
Ship exhaust doesn’t just warm the planet—it poisons the air near coastlines and ports. The health effects include:
- Increased rates of childhood asthma, due to particulate and NOx exposure.
- Elevated risks of cancer, heart disease, and respiratory failure attributed to SOx and PM2.5 pollution.
- Worsened air quality for millions living near major shipping corridors and port facilities.
For many port-adjacent neighborhoods, this means living with dangerous air every day, despite lacking any direct economic benefit from the passing cargo.
Are Retailers Taking Real Action?
Facing public pressure and a growing climate-conscious consumer base, some retailers are finally acknowledging their maritime emissions. For example:
- A Target spokesperson highlighted their commitment to reducing transportation emissions as part of a goal to reach net-zero emissions by 2040.
- Ikea stated a target to shrink its shipping carbon footprint by 70% by 2030, noting that ocean shipping is currently responsible for 40% of its logistics-related climate impact.
However, most retailers stop short of requiring zero-emissions vessels or proactively transitioning to genuinely green shipping solutions. The core business model still depends on fossil fuel carriers to move massive volumes at the lowest cost, passing environmental damage onto others.
What Solutions Exist for Greener Cargo Shipping?
Substantial reductions in cargo shipping pollution are technically possible, but will demand a mix of bold action and structural change, including:
- Contracting Green Ships: Retailers can demand that their goods travel on the most modern, fuel-efficient, or alternative-fuel vessels already available.
- Investing in Zero-Emission Technology: Support for wind-assisted, solar-powered, battery-electric, or hydrogen-fueled ships is essential for long-term transformation.
- Stringent Regulations: Individual companies alone cannot solve the issue—ambitious, enforceable policies are needed to drive innovation and penalize laggards.
- Comprehensive Emissions Reporting: Companies should fully disclose emissions from all parts of their supply chain, including third-party shipping.
Until then, simple steps like adjusting shipping contracts to favor greener ships are available, yet few retailers have seized the opportunity.
Retailer Responsibilities in the Age of Environmental Accountability
Retailers have marketed themselves as sustainable leaders but can no longer ignore the true environmental cost of transoceanic shipping. To be credible climate stewards, they must:
- Count all emissions: Publicly report shipping emissions alongside in-house operations.
- Transition to cleaner ships: Accelerate investment and advocacy for zero-emission vessels.
- Push for strong policy: Support mandatory regulations that require clean technology fleet-wide.
- Prioritize environmental justice: Recognize and address the unequal pollution burden on coastal and port communities.
Without integrating maritime logistics into their sustainability frameworks, retailers’ green promises ring hollow.
Table: Actions Retail Giants Must Take Towards Greener Shipping
| Action | Details |
|---|---|
| End reliance on dirty ships | Phase out fossil fuel-only shipping contracts; prioritize modern, low/zero-emissions vessels |
| Support new tech | Invest in innovation: wind, batteries, green hydrogen, and advanced efficiency retrofits |
| Demand transparency | Require shippers and logistics partners to fully report emissions data |
| Lobby for reform | Advocate for enforceable international and domestic standards for ocean shipping pollution |
| Engage communities | Involve frontline port communities in decision-making and invest in public health mitigation |
The Role of Policy: Why Businesses Can’t Fix This Alone
Industry action is essential, but experts widely agree on the need for ambitious, mandatory regulations to make zero-emission shipping the norm rather than the exception. Regulations should:
- Set strict timelines for phasing out fossil-fueled ships globally
- Create clear standards for measuring and reporting emissions
- Incentivize rapid deployment of alternative shipping fuels and propulsion technologies
Public policy also has a crucial role in closing price gaps, ensuring that clean shipping options are competitively available to even the largest retailers, and that laggards do not maintain an unfair cost advantage by polluting more.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Why do large retailers have such a big shipping footprint?
A: Leading retailers source most goods from distant factories, importing vast quantities via ocean shipping, which is still overwhelmingly powered by dirty fossil fuels. The scale of their operations means even small improvements can have huge impacts on overall emissions.
Q: What pollutants do cargo ships emit besides carbon dioxide?
A: In addition to CO2, cargo ships emit sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5)—all of which cause serious environmental and public health risks, especially in port communities.
Q: Are retailers required to report their shipping emissions?
A: Currently, most retailers do not include marine shipping emissions in their public climate disclosures. Pressure from consumers, NGOs, and future regulations may soon change this standard.
Q: What is being done to make cargo shipping greener?
A: Some companies are piloting cleaner ships, supporting innovative fuels, and improving efficiency, but industry-wide progress depends on enforceable regulations and bold commitments from major retailers and policymakers alike.
Q: How can consumers influence retailer shipping practices?
A: By demanding transparency, supporting brands with ambitious supply chain sustainability policies, and favoring those investing in clean shipping, consumers help push the market toward greener logistics.
References
- https://marine-digital.com/article_why_need_greener_ships
- https://multichannelmerchant.com/operations/last-mile-sustainability-retails-environmental-impact/
- https://ecooptimism.com/?tag=treehugger
- https://sifted.com/resources/the-future-of-shipping-how-these-7-companies-are-leading-the-way-in-sustainability/
- https://stand.earth/fashion/resources/2025-scorecard/impact-areas/greener-shipping/
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
