Reinventing the Building Sector to Cut Carbon Emissions
Comprehensive strategies are transforming building design and construction to drastically cut carbon emissions and fight climate change.
Transforming the Building Sector to Cut Carbon Emissions
The building sector is one of the largest contributors to global greenhouse gas emissions, responsible for both operational and embodied carbon. While energy efficiency in operation is often prioritized, experts are now spotlighting the urgent need to address emissions produced during construction, material sourcing, and demolition. Emerging research and industry innovation reveal strategies to dramatically reduce the sector’s carbon footprint—reimagining not just how buildings perform, but how they are conceived, built, and even deconstructed.
Understanding Carbon in Buildings: Operational vs. Embodied
To effectively cut emissions from the building sector, it is crucial to distinguish between operational carbon and embodied carbon:
- Operational Carbon: Emissions produced by heating, lighting, cooling, and running a building throughout its life.
- Embodied Carbon: Emissions generated during the extraction, manufacture, transport, and assembly of building materials, as well as during demolition and waste handling at end-of-life.
Historically, the focus has been on curbing operational emissions. However, as buildings become more energy-efficient, embodied carbon now accounts for a rising share—often half or more of a building’s total life cycle emissions. Addressing embodied emissions has become a critical frontier for meaningful climate action in the built environment.
Toward Deep Decarbonization: A Carbon Hierarchy Approach
Experts promote a hierarchical strategy for carbon reduction—mirroring the familiar “reduce, reuse, recycle” ethos. The steps, in priority order:
- Avoid: Design to eliminate unnecessary new construction and prioritize low-carbon materials and processes whenever possible.
- Replace: Swap high-carbon materials (like cement and steel) for low-carbon or regenerative alternatives (like engineered timber or recycled materials).
- Reduce: Minimize quantities of materials and optimize construction processes to use less carbon-intensive resources and energy.
- Offset: As a last resort, offset unavoidable emissions, recognizing that true net zero must prioritize direct emissions reductions.
By following this “carbon hierarchy,” the building sector can systematically lower its climate impact and move toward net zero targets.
Rethinking Material Choices
Bio-Based Materials and Carbon Sequestration
Material selection is central to reducing embodied carbon. Using bio-based materials like mass timber unlocks the potential for carbon sequestration—storing atmospheric carbon within the building structure itself.
- Mass timber, used in high-rise projects such as Norway’s Mjøstårnet, weighs around 20% as much as concrete, reducing demand for carbon-intensive foundations and dramatically lowering both material and transportation emissions.
- Studies confirm that the CO2 emitted during timber’s harvest, transport, and manufacturing is negligible compared to the carbon sequestered within the wood structure.
- Bio-based alternatives like bamboo and grasses are also promising, particularly in regions where timber is less abundant or suitable.
However, the applicability of such materials depends on local context, regulation, and climate. Durability and fire safety concerns are being addressed by new research and evolving building codes that increasingly permit, and even encourage, innovative uses of mass timber and other renewable materials.
What others are reading
Concrete, Steel, and Reducing High-Carbon Materials
Because concrete and steel are among the most carbon-intensive building materials, dramatic carbon savings are possible by:
- Switching to lower-carbon concrete mixes, incorporating recycled aggregates or alternative binders.
- Optimizing structural design to use less material while maintaining strength.
- Salvaging and reusing steel components from decommissioned buildings.
- Substituting exterior walls with lower-carbon alternatives; some studies found that swapping standard concrete block for hollow blocks with stone cladding can cut embodied emissions by 18%.
Retrofitting Over Demolition and Reconstruction
It is a widespread misconception that simply replacing old buildings with new, energy-efficient structures automatically reduces long-term emissions. While newer buildings can be more efficient in operation, the upfront emissions from demolition and reconstruction are often enormous:
- Case studies show that retrofitting an old house—rather than demolishing and rebuilding—emits only a fraction of the carbon (8 tons of CO2e vs. 80 tons for reconstruction).
- It can take decades (sometimes 35–70 years) for the improved operational efficiency of a new building to “pay back” the carbon emitted by demolition and new construction.
- Long-lived structural elements (foundations, framing) are often viable for reuse and can last well over 100 years.
Retrofitting—updating building envelopes, systems, and interiors—should be prioritized whenever cost and structural integrity allow. This delivers climate benefits far more quickly than new construction and preserves valuable embodied carbon in existing materials.
Design for Disassembly: Extending the Life of Materials
Conventional construction assumes that at the end of a building’s life, materials will be landfilled or downcycled. Designing with disassembly in mind allows major structural components to be recovered, reused, or recycled more efficiently:
- Design for deconstruction can lower demolition costs by nearly 10% and reduce demolition-related carbon emissions by up to 40%.
- Timber and other bio-based materials can be reused with much lower carbon impact, especially if components are systematically labeled and easily removable.
- Comprehensive carbon accounting for the design and demolition phases is essential and increasingly supported by new assessment methods and datasets.
Modular and Prefabricated Construction
Modular construction—employing factory-built modules assembled on site—has seen a rapid rise, especially in North America:
- Over 6% of new building starts are now modular, reflecting a threefold growth since 2015.
- Factory manufacturing allows greater precision, reduced material waste, improved quality control, and faster project timelines.
- Prefabricated components, especially when paired with high-performance insulation and airtight envelopes (as in Passive House and net-zero standards), sharply reduce carbon emissions both during construction and operation.
- Stock plans and panelized systems further streamline construction, making climate-friendly building solutions more accessible and affordable for architects, builders, and homeowners alike.
Innovative companies offer panelized wall systems made from wood frames and dense-pack cellulose insulation, with high R-values and smart vapor control. Clients can pair these systems with locally sourced finishes to maximize carbon savings and build resilience.
Life Cycle Assessment: Holistic Carbon Accounting
To achieve net zero, designers and policymakers must adopt holistic life cycle assessment (LCA), covering:
- Raw material extraction
- Manufacturing and transport
- Construction methods
- Operational emissions
- Demolition, reuse, and recycling
| Stage | Main Carbon Sources | Reduction Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Material Extraction | Fossil fuel use, land use change, mining emissions | Use recycled, renewable, or local materials |
| Manufacturing | Process emissions (cement, steel), energy use | Switch to low-carbon manufacturing, use less material |
| Transport | Trucking, shipping fuel | Source materials closer to site, use efficient logistics |
| Construction | On-site energy, waste, machinery | Prefabrication, modular approaches, waste reduction |
| Operation | Heating, cooling, lighting, equipment use | Passive design, high-performance envelopes, renewables |
| End-of-Life | Demolition, landfill, downcycling | Design for disassembly, recycling, material reuse |
New tools now let designers assess the embodied carbon impact of specific materials and assemblies during the earliest design stages, even allowing real-time comparisons to choose the lowest-carbon options.
Policy and Industry Action: Scaling Up Change
Progress is underway—especially through voluntary industry standards and global campaigns such as the World Green Building Council’s calls for mandatory carbon accounting and limits on embodied carbon in new buildings.
- Increasingly, government incentives and regulations require operational energy reductions to be matched by embodied carbon calculations and reporting.
- Assessment of embodied carbon impact, however, remains largely voluntary in much of the world. Greater policy action is needed for broad transformation.
- Emerging technologies and supply chain innovations are making carbon-conscious design and construction more feasible at scale.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between operational and embodied carbon in buildings?
Operational carbon refers to emissions from running a building (heating, cooling, lighting, appliances) throughout its life. Embodied carbon covers emissions from material production, transport, construction, and disposal at end-of-life. As buildings get more energy-efficient, embodied carbon makes up an increasing share of total emissions.
Why is retrofitting existing buildings usually better for carbon reduction than building new?
Retrofitting preserves existing materials and structure, avoiding huge upfront emissions from demolition and new construction. Even the most efficient new building can take decades to offset the carbon penalty of its construction when compared to deep energy retrofits on older buildings.
How does modular or prefabricated construction lower carbon emissions?
Modular and prefabricated methods centralize manufacturing, which leads to material and energy efficiency, reduced waste, and faster construction. These gains cut both embodied and operational emissions, especially when paired with careful material choices and high-performance design.
What building materials help store carbon and why is that beneficial?
Bio-based materials like wood and bamboo sequester carbon naturally during growth. When used in buildings, this stored carbon is kept out of the atmosphere for decades or more, helping offset other emissions and even potentially leading to net negative carbon buildings.
What actions can governments take to reduce building sector emissions?
Governments can require carbon accounting, set embodied carbon limits, incentivize retrofits, fund research into low-carbon materials, and promote design for disassembly and modular methods. Coordinated policy is crucial to drive systemic change across the sector.
References
- https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/a3474878-71ca-44ad-a584-3c888722673e/download
- https://www.bpublicprefab.com/news/treehugger-bpublic-designs-panelized-passive-house-prefabs-building-systems-that-prioritize-sustainability-and-a-reduced-carbon-footprint-yfpbk
- https://fairsnape.com/2020/01/07/a-carbon-hierarchy-for-net-zero-carbon-construction/
- https://www.buildersforclimateaction.org
- https://repository.belmont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1503&context=burs
- https://islandpress.org/books/build-beyond-zero
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
