Home » Environment

Understanding the Migratory Bird Treaty Act’s Purpose, Scope, and Legacy

Explore the legacy and continued impact of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act in safeguarding North America's migratory birds.

By Medha deb

Created on Sep 27, 2025

Explore the legacy and continued impact of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act in safeguarding North America's migratory birds.

Migratory Bird Treaty Act: Protecting America’s Birds for Over a Century

Few pieces of legislation have shaped the conservation landscape of the United States as profoundly as the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Enacted in 1918 in response to crisis-level declines in bird populations, this law has stood as a bulwark for migratory bird protection and a model for future conservation efforts.

What Is the Migratory Bird Treaty Act?
Origins and Historical Context
Scope and Key Provisions of the MBTA
Which Birds Are Protected?
International Partnerships and Treaty Evolution
Milestones, Amendments, and Legal Challenges
The MBTA Today: Modern Challenges and Enforcement
The Act’s Global Influence
Controversy and the Push for Reform
Why the MBTA Still Matters
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What Is the Migratory Bird Treaty Act?

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 is a federal law enacted to curb the rapid decline of bird populations in North America. It was designed to implement a 1916 treaty between the United States and Great Britain (on behalf of Canada), making it illegal to pursue, hunt, take, capture, kill, or sell birds listed as migratory, as well as their eggs, nests, and parts, unless explicitly authorized by regulation.
This crucial conservation statute gave the U.S. federal government the authority to regulate the protection of migratory birds, superseding piecemeal state laws that proved ineffective during a period of rampant commercial exploitation and habitat destruction.

Origins and Historical Context

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, millions of birds in North America were slaughtered for feathers, meat, and commerce, especially to meet the demand for women’s fashion accessories. With states unable to stem the loss through local laws, growing environmental awareness and scientific advocacy prompted calls for federal intervention.
The 1914 extinction of the passenger pigeon loomed as a grave warning, galvanizing the public and lawmakers alike. The need for coordinated action was clear.

Early Attempts at Federal Protection: The Weeks-McLean Act (1913) was an initial federal effort, but legal challenges undermined its authority.
Pivotal Court Case: In Missouri v. Holland (1920), the Supreme Court confirmed federal power to implement treaties regulating wildlife, upholding the MBTA and shifting wildlife management from state to national control.
Public Outcry and Treaty Formation: Driven partly by the devastation of bird populations and the death of the last passenger pigeon, the U.S. negotiated its first Migratory Bird Treaty with Great Britain in 1916.

Scope and Key Provisions of the MBTA

The MBTA’s power lies in the sweeping, clear language of its core provisions. It is a criminal statute prohibiting the unauthorized “take” of migratory birds—a term broadly defined to include killing, capturing, possessing, selling, trading, and transporting birds, their eggs, and nests.The law also bars hunting with the use of bait and covers both intentional and, historically, some unintentional acts that could result in bird deaths.

Federal Crime: It is an offense to take or kill migratory birds or their parts without a special permit from the Secretary of the Interior.
Baiting Restrictions: Hunting game birds with the aid of bait, or in areas that are baited, is forbidden.
Permitting System: Allows for regulated exceptions, such as scientific research, Native American ceremonies, and other special circumstances.

Importantly, the MBTA can hold individuals, corporations, and agencies liable, although the extent of this liability has been subject to interpretation and revision over the years.

Which Birds Are Protected?

Coverage under the MBTA originally extended to species listed in the 1916 treaty, mainly those crossing U.S. and Canadian borders. The Act now protects more than 1,000 species of migratory birds, including many common and threatened birds, under four international conventions.

Category	Examples	Notes
Common Species	American Crow, Mallard Duck	Ubiquitous, often encountered birds
Raptors	Bald Eagle, Red-tailed Hawk	Also covered by other specific protections
Shorebirds	Willet, Sanderling	Frequent coastal and wetland species
Threatened/Rare	Spectacled Eider, Whooping Crane	May also be listed under the Endangered Species Act
Game Birds	Canada Goose, Ring-necked Pheasant	Subject to regulated hunting seasons

While the list is comprehensive, only native species are protected. Invasive birds (such as European starlings or house sparrows) do not receive MBTA protections.

International Partnerships and Treaty Evolution

The MBTA was born from a commitment to work with international partners. Over time, the Act has evolved as additional treaties were ratified:

1916 — Treaty with Great Britain on behalf of Canada
1936 — Treaty with Mexico (amended in 1972 and 1999)
1972 — Treaty with Japan
1976 — Treaty with Russia

Each treaty adds species and often integrates cultural exceptions, such as the 1995 amendment with Canada allowing traditional subsistence hunting for Indigenous peoples. This multinational framework underscores the shared responsibility for protecting migratory birds across borders.

Historic Milestones and Legal Challenges

Since its enactment, the MBTA has served as a template for environmental law and weathered political and legal storms. Key milestones include:

1920: Missouri v. Holland: Supreme Court upholds the federal government’s role in enforcing the Act under treaty power.
Expansion: The list of protected species has grown as new treaties were signed, adapting the Act for global cooperation and biodiversity protection.
Enforcement Evolution: Penalties and permitting systems have evolved to address commercial, recreational, and subsistence activities.

Opposition has persisted, notably around states’ rights and fears of federal overreach, but the Act has proven resilient as the foundation of American bird protection policy.

The MBTA Today: Modern Challenges and Enforcement

In the 21st century, the MBTA faces new pressures and interpretations:

Incidental Take: For many years, the act was interpreted to prohibit both intentional and incidental (accidental) killings—such as a bird killed by an industrial accident or oil spill. However, legal opinions on this have shifted with changing administrations, creating uncertainty for conservation enforcement.
Business and Infrastructure: Industries from energy to agriculture have challenged liability for unintended bird deaths, prompting debates about modernizing the law to balance wildlife protection and economic activity.
Climate Change: Habitat loss, shifting migration patterns, and extreme weather caused by climate change increase the importance of robust bird protections.
Permitting: The Fish and Wildlife Service issues permits for activities like scientific research, education, rehabilitation, tribal use, and certain controlled bird removals. These must comply with strict conditions.

The Act’s Global Influence

The MBTA is recognized as a pioneering example of international wildlife legislation. Its framework supports bilateral and multilateral conservation initiatives, coordinates migratory bird management among partner nations, and has inspired similar laws abroad. The MBTA’s focus on legally binding international treaties sets a global precedent in species conservation.

Controversy and the Push for Reform

Although widely praised by conservationists, the MBTA has generated debate and legal test cases over its breadth and application:

Scope of Liability: Legal scholars and industries have disputed whether the act should penalize only direct, intentional harm or include accidental deaths (e.g., birds killed by wind turbines).
State vs. Federal Authority: Conflicts over whether wildlife management should be locally or federally controlled were especially acute at the Act’s inception and occasionally resurface.
Reform Initiatives: Reforms are periodically proposed to clarify terms, adjust penalties, or incorporate new scientific and conservation priorities.
Societal Values: Changing public attitudes toward wildlife use and protection continue to shape the MBTA’s enforcement and potential amendments.

Despite these challenges, most experts agree the MBTA’s flexible framework is essential to long-term bird conservation in the face of evolving threats.

Why the MBTA Still Matters

For more than a century, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act has provided the legal backbone for protecting bird life in the United States. Its achievements are noteworthy:

Prevention of Extinctions: Many species imperiled by market hunting and habitat loss have recovered under MBTA protections.
Biodiversity: The MBTA preserves ecosystem health and resilience by protecting keystone migratory bird species.
Foundation for Future Legislation: The Act laid the groundwork for subsequent environmental laws, including the Endangered Species Act, and influenced policy at multiple levels of government.
International Collaboration: It embodies a commitment to cross-border wildlife stewardship, vital for migratory species that travel thousands of miles annually.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Which birds are covered under the MBTA?

A: More than 1,000 species are protected, encompassing nearly all native migratory birds found in the U.S., including songbirds, waterfowl, raptors, and some endangered species. Non-native and invasive species are not protected under the MBTA.

Q: Is it illegal to keep a feather or pick up a dead bird?

A: Yes. The MBTA makes it unlawful to possess, collect, or sell feathers, nests, eggs, or dead birds from protected species without a special federal permit, even if you found them naturally. There are limited exceptions for permitted scientific, educational, or ceremonial use.

Q: Are there exceptions or permits available?

A: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service may issue permits for activities like research, rehabilitation, depredation (removal of problem birds), Native American religious use, and some educational purposes. Hunting of some species is also allowed during regulated seasons. Unpermitted commercial trade or possession remains strictly prohibited.

Q: What are the penalties for violating the MBTA?

A: Penalties vary but can include substantial fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. Both individuals and corporations can be prosecuted for violations.

Q: How does the MBTA address new threats like wind farms or oil spills?

A: Interpretation of the MBTA in relation to incidental (unintentional) bird deaths has varied with different administrations and court rulings. Many conservationists advocate for explicit rules to address these modern threats without diluting the Act’s original intent.

Key Takeaways

The MBTA remains the primary legal protection for migratory birds in the United States.
It established the importance of federal and international cooperation in wildlife conservation.
Interpretation and enforcement are dynamic and have been shaped by shifting legal, scientific, and societal factors.

The MBTA’s enduring impact illustrates that strong, science-based laws and international treaties are essential for safeguarding irreplaceable natural heritage. Conservationists, policymakers, and the public alike continue to look to this law as both a shield for birds and a symbol of the nation’s environmental commitment.

References

Author

medha deb

Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb