Home » Environment

Which Flights Have the Highest Carbon Footprint?

Explore how different flights contribute to global emissions and learn what can be done to reduce aviation’s carbon footprint.

By Sneha Tete, Integrated MA, Certified Relationship Coach

Created on Sep 27, 2025

Explore how different flights contribute to global emissions and learn what can be done to reduce aviation’s carbon footprint.

The environmental cost of air travel is substantial, with some flights producing dramatically more greenhouse gas emissions than others. While aviation makes up a relatively small percentage of global carbon emissions, the particular characteristics and impacts of certain flights—especially long-haul and private jet journeys—mean that their climate impact is disproportionately large. This article explores which flights have the greatest carbon footprint, why they matter for climate action, and what can be done to reduce the environmental burden of flying.

Why Flying Has a High Carbon Footprint

Aviation accounts for about 2–3% of global carbon dioxide emissions, but its impact extends far beyond tailpipe CO₂. Aircraft engines release not just CO₂ but also water vapor, nitrogen oxides, and particulates at high altitudes—where their net warming effect can be up to twice as high as the carbon dioxide alone. Crucially, the emissions from aircraft have a much greater warming effect per unit of fuel burned than ground transportation, due to atmospheric physics.

High altitude emissions: The release of water vapor and nitrogen oxides at flight cruising altitudes increases the greenhouse effect.
No scalable decarbonization: Modern aviation relies almost entirely on fossil jet fuel, with biofuels and electric planes still a minor presence.
Demand growth: Even as aviation emissions per mile decrease due to better efficiency, overall emissions are growing due to rising demand.

The Flights With the Highest Carbon Footprint

Not all flights are equal in climate impact. Because takeoff and landing are energy-intensive, longer flights emit more total CO₂, but short-haul flights are less efficient per mile. That said, some specific types of flights, and the way we fly, are especially problematic:

1. Long-Haul Nonstop Flights

Intercontinental flights—such as New York to Tokyo or London to Sydney—produce the most emissions per passenger overall. For example:

A round-trip flight between New York and San Francisco emits about 2–3 metric tons of carbon dioxide per person.
Longer international routes can generate as much as 5 metric tons of CO₂ per passenger.

This is more than the average annual emissions for a person in many developing countries and can represent a significant share of an individual’s yearly carbon footprint.

2. First Class, Business Class, and Private Jets

Flying first class or in a private jet massively multiplies your carbon impact:

First class uses up to 4x the space of economy, while business class can use 2–3x as much, meaning the plane carries fewer people for the same amount of fuel burned.
Private jets are the most carbon-intensive way to fly. A single private jet passenger can be responsible for more than 10 times as many emissions as an economy class commercial flyer. Short hops in private jets are especially polluting per mile.

On a per-person basis, private jet flights can generate dozens of tons of CO₂ per flight—more than most people emit in an entire year. Although private flights are a small share of overall flights, their disproportionate impact is a significant concern.

3. Short-Haul Flights

While they produce less total emissions than long-haul flights, short routes are very inefficient:

Takeoff and landing are fuel-intensive, so short flights have a higher emissions rate per mile than direct long flights.
Many short flights serve routes where alternative, lower-carbon options (trains, buses, or even driving) are available.

Switching from short-haul flights to trains or virtual meetings is a key opportunity to reduce emissions.

4. Stopovers and Connecting Flights

Every takeoff and landing is carbon-intensive. Adding stopovers increases the total carbon footprint of a journey. Flying non-stop is usually less polluting overall, even if the route is slightly longer.

What About ‘Embodied’ Carbon? The Hidden Emissions of Airplanes

Beyond fuel burned in flight, air travel’s carbon footprint includes the vast resources used to manufacture, maintain, and dispose of planes:

Aircraft manufacturing requires energy-intensive materials: aluminum, titanium, carbon fiber, plastics, and composites.
Planes typically have a lifespan of 15–20 years, after which many are scrapped, sometimes after relatively brief service.
Most aircraft are landfilled or sent to “boneyards”; only a small fraction of parts are salvaged or recycled for other uses.

The energy and resources required to build and eventually decommission aircraft contribute “embodied” or “upfront” carbon, which, while smaller than operational emissions, are not insignificant and must be considered for a full picture of aviation’s environmental impact.

Why Aviation’s Carbon Impact Gets So Much Attention

Aviation often gets outsized attention in climate discussions for several reasons:

Inequality: The richest percentage of the global population flies the most. Frequent flyers, celebrities, and business leaders account for a majority of total air miles.
Alternatives exist: Many flights—especially short-haul—can be replaced by lower-carbon options. Reducing unnecessary flights can be a straightforward climate action.
Growth is rapid: Unlike some sectors, aviation emissions are projected to rise dramatically without intervention.
No technical silver bullet: There are currently no commercially viable ways to fully decarbonize large-scale air travel with today’s technology.
Individual responsibility: For those concerned about personal carbon footprints, flying is often the single largest discretionary source of emissions.

Calculating the Carbon Footprint of Flights

Estimating the carbon footprint of a single flight depends on several factors:

Distance flown: The longer the flight, the higher the total emissions, but emissions per mile can decrease slightly for longer trips due to cruise efficiency.
Class of travel: First and business class have a much greater footprint per passenger than economy.
Aircraft type: Newer, more fuel-efficient aircraft can reduce per-passenger emissions.
Number of stopovers: Multiple takeoffs/landings increase emissions.
Passenger load factor: Flights with more empty seats spread their emissions over fewer people.

Journey Type	CO₂ per passenger (Round Trip)	Notes
Short-haul (e.g., 300 miles)	~0.2–0.3 metric tons	Per-mile emissions are highest
Medium-haul (e.g., NY–Chicago)	~0.5 metric tons	Still significant with alternatives often available
Long-haul (e.g., NY–London)	~1.6–2.0 metric tons	Major source of emissions for individuals
First/Business (long-haul)	Up to 4–5 times economy	Disproportionate impact per passenger
Private jet (short-hop)	5–20 metric tons or more	Extremely carbon-intensive, small passenger count

How Do Flights Compare to Other Travel Options?

Air travel’s carbon intensity varies significantly compared to other modes:

Driving solo: About 404 grams CO₂ per mile.
Commercial flying: Roughly 145 grams CO₂ per passenger mile. Flying can be less carbon-intensive than driving alone, but only when aircraft are packed and flight distances are long.
Train or coach bus: These emit far less CO₂ per passenger mile than flights or cars.

For routes covered by high-speed rail or efficient public transport, switching modes can slash your carbon footprint.

Can Sustainable Aviation Technologies Reduce Emissions?

Several emerging technologies and practices promise lower-carbon air travel, but challenges remain:

Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAFs)

Biofuels made from camelina or other feedstocks can cut aviation’s emissions by up to 84% compared to conventional jet fuel. However, sustainable large-scale deployment is limited by feedstock availability, cost, and certification hurdles.

More Fuel-Efficient Aircraft

New aircraft designs, engines, and materials are incrementally reducing per-flight emissions.
Examples include split scimitar winglets that save thousands of gallons of fuel each year, and RNP navigation for more direct routing.

Operational Improvements

Shorter taxi times, direct routes, and lighter loads all contribute to better efficiency.
Some airlines have adopted paperless cockpits, eliminated single-use plastics, and reduced onboard weight.

Offsetting Emissions

Travelers can contribute to carbon offset programs, which invest in projects that remove or avoid emissions elsewhere.
Offsetting is a controversial solution and considered by many a temporary measure, not a substitute for systemic change.

Airlines Taking Action: Examples of Sustainable Practices

Alaska Airlines: Led innovation in fuel efficiency and biofuels, and composts in-flight waste. The airline aims to reduce emissions 15% by 2030 and powers headquarters with renewable electricity.
Cathay Pacific: Enhanced efficiency by 28% since 1998, eliminated hundreds of millions of plastic items, and serves plant-based meals to reduce food-related emissions.
American Airlines: Upgraded to a younger, more efficient fleet and partners with Cool Effect to enable passenger carbon offsets, targeting a 50% emissions reduction in the next 30 years.

What Can Individuals Do to Minimize Their Flying Footprint?

Fly less: Combine trips, prioritize teleconferences, or replace flights with trains where possible.
Choose economy: The lower the class, the lower the per-passenger carbon cost.
Fly direct: Non-stop flights are typically less carbon-intensive per mile than those with layovers.
Use modern, efficient airlines: Look for airlines committed to sustainability and investing in fuel-efficient fleets or biofuel use.
Offset your flights: Use high-quality, transparent offset programs to neutralize what you can’t cut.

Key Takeaways About Aviation’s Carbon Footprint

Flying, especially long-haul and by private jet, is one of the most carbon-intensive personal activities.
Alternatives such as trains or virtual meetings can make a dramatic difference.
Incremental change in efficiency and fuels helps, but addressing aviation emissions at scale will require rethinking how much, how often, and why we fly.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Which types of flights have the worst carbon footprint?

A: Private jet flights and first-class long-haul journeys have the highest per-person carbon footprints. Ultra-long flights and short routes with alternatives also rank high in impact.

Q: How does air travel compare to other forms of transportation regarding emissions?

A: Air travel is usually more carbon-intensive than trains or buses, but flying can be less polluting than driving solo over long distances. However, occupancy and travel efficiency influence the comparison.

Q: Are biofuels a realistic solution for making flying green?

A: Advanced biofuels like those from camelina can cut emissions by up to 84%, but supply and scaling challenges limit their immediate potential. They are helpful, but not yet a complete solution.

Q: What is “embodied carbon” in aviation?

A: Embodied carbon refers to the greenhouse gases produced throughout the building, maintenance, and disposal of aircraft—not just the fuel used in flight. This includes the manufacture of high-tech materials and eventual aircraft retirement.

Q: What can travelers do to reduce their flying impact?

A: Opt to fly economy, favor non-stop flights, use airlines investing in efficiency, consider trains for shorter routes, and offset unavoidable emissions through high-quality programs.

References

Author

Sneha TeteBeauty & Lifestyle Writer

Sneha is a relationships and lifestyle writer with a strong foundation in applied linguistics and certified training in relationship coaching. She brings over five years of writing experience to thebridalbox, crafting thoughtful, research-driven content that empowers readers to build healthier relationships, boost emotional well-being, and embrace holistic living.

Read full bio of Sneha Tete