Greenpeace Exposes Declining US Plastic Recycling Rates
A deep dive into why plastic recycling rates in the US have worsened, and why industry-backed solutions fall short.
Greenpeace Report Reveals Grim Realities of US Plastic Recycling
In a comprehensive analysis, Greenpeace USA’s updated report, Circular Claims Fall Flat Again, exposes the worsening state of the US plastic recycling system. With declining recycling rates and mounting production, the report challenges decades of industry narratives and calls for sweeping changes to how plastic waste is managed.
Background: The Persistent Myth of Plastic Recycling
For years, corporations and industry groups have promoted plastic recycling as the primary solution to plastic waste. However, the latest Greenpeace findings reveal this as a persistent myth—practically, most plastic in the US is not recyclable. Of the estimated 51 million tons of plastic waste generated by households in 2021, only about 2.4 million tons were recycled, representing a mere 5% recycling rate, down from a high of 9.5% in 2014.
Compared to other materials, plastics perform poorly in recycling:
- Paper and cardboard: Recycled at high rates
- Metals (e.g., aluminum): Over 30% recycling rate
- Glass: 31.3% recycling rate
- Plastic: Only 5–6% recycling rate in recent years
Plastic Recycling Rates: Decline and Contributing Factors
The US plastic recycling rate has dropped sharply since its peak, worsening after China’s 2018 policy change to stop accepting Western plastic waste. As US domestic facilities struggled to cope, the overall effectiveness of plastic recycling degraded.
| Year | US Plastic Recycling Rate (%) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 9.5 |
| 2018 | 8.7 |
| 2021 | 5–6 |
Only two types of plastic—polyethylene terephthalate (PET, commonly used in beverage bottles) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE, found in milk jugs and shampoo bottles)—are widely accepted by US recycling facilities. Even these have very limited reprocessing rates:
- PET: ~21% actual reprocessing rate
- HDPE: ~10% actual reprocessing rate
Greenpeace highlights that acceptance by a recycling facility doesn’t guarantee recycling; much accepted plastic ends up as residual waste.
Key Barriers: Why Plastic Recycling Fails
Greenpeace identifies several fundamental and interlinked barriers to successful plastic recycling:
- Difficult collection: Millions of distributed, contaminated items create overwhelming logistical challenges.
- Impossible sortation: The diversity of plastic types and contamination makes sorting virtually impossible at scale.
- Wasteful reprocessing: The recycling process itself often produces environmentally harmful byproducts.
- Toxicity: Many plastics contain or accumulate toxic additives and contaminants during recycling, leading to even greater health and environmental issues.
- Poor economics: Recycling plastic is rarely profitable due to low output quality and high sorting costs.
The Toxicity Problem
Greenpeace’s report argues that recycling can increase the toxicity of plastics. During the recycling process, residues and contaminants often accumulate, making reused plastics potentially more hazardous than their original forms.
This undermines popular industry claims of a closed-loop, “circular economy” for plastics. As Graham Forbes of Greenpeace USA states: “The toxicity of plastic actually increases with recycling. Plastics have no place in a circular economy and the only real solution is to massively reduce plastic production.”
Industry Narratives Versus Reality
Greenpeace criticizes the role of major consumer goods and fossil fuel companies—such as Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Nestlé, and Unilever—for promoting recycling as a solution while failing to implement truly sustainable waste management policies.
- These companies have supported industry groups and funded NGOs to champion recycling, creating the impression of material circularity.
- Greenpeace’s findings show that these efforts have largely delayed real progress, allowing increased virgin plastic production and deepening the pollution crisis.
What others are reading
Advanced (Chemical) Recycling: False Hope?
Industry proponents often spotlight advanced recycling technologies as the future. However, Greenpeace’s report includes case studies on failed chemical recycling plants, demonstrating that chemical recycling has not delivered the promised results:
- High capital and operational costs remain barriers to scalability.
- End products are often of poorer quality or require further processing.
- Environmental impacts and toxicity concerns have not been resolved.
Defining ‘Recyclable’—Greenpeace Versus Industry Benchmarks
Greenpeace’s report applies the Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s definition of recyclable: materials must achieve at least a 30% recycling rate across a population of 400 million. According to this standard, no US plastic packaging qualifies as truly recyclable. This exposes the gap between industry commitments and actual outcomes.
Greenpeace’s Call to Action: Beyond Recycling
The failure of plastic recycling requires a bold shift in both policy and practice. Greenpeace advocates for several actionable steps:
- Move to reuse systems and packaging-free approaches: At least 50% reusable packaging by 2030
- Standardize packaging: Create shared infrastructure for collection, sanitization, and redistribution
- Phase out single-use plastics: Eliminate both virgin and recycled single-use plastic items
- Release verified transparency data: Companies should annually report and verify their single-use packaging footprints
- Advocate for policy transformation: Push for legislation that enforces reduction, transparency, and reuse requirements
How Reuse Systems Can Work
Greenpeace emphasizes the promise of reuse and refill systems, which are:
- Packaging-free or low-packaging options for products
- Standardized collection and cleaning infrastructure to allow multiple cycles of use
- Community and business alignment to support local reuse programs
By switching to reuse, companies and consumers can prevent plastic pollution at the source and avoid the pitfalls of recycling inefficiencies.
Comparison of Material Recycling Rates
| Material | US Recycling Rate (%) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Paper & Cardboard | High | Widely accepted, profitable, high-quality output |
| Aluminum | ~34.9 | Valuable, easy to collect and recycle |
| Glass | 31.3 | Recycled at much higher rates than plastic |
| Plastic | 5–6 | Complex, costly, mostly lost or landfilled |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Why has the US plastic recycling rate declined so drastically?
A: The decline is mainly due to China’s decision to stop accepting US plastic waste in 2018, challenges in sorting and contamination, lack of developed domestic infrastructure, and increased production of virgin plastics.
Q: Are any plastics truly recyclable in the US?
A: According to Greenpeace’s criteria, no type of plastic packaging is truly recyclable in the US. While PET and HDPE are accepted for recycling, only a small percentage is actually reprocessed into new products.
Q: What is the main difference between plastics and other recyclable materials?
A: Unlike materials like paper, glass, and metals, which are easily sorted, recycled profitably, and reused, plastic recycling faces challenges with contamination, sorting, and resulting toxicity, making recycling much less effective and sustainable.
Q: What is chemical (advanced) recycling and does it work?
A: Chemical recycling refers to processes that break plastics down into chemical components for reuse. Greenpeace’s assessments show these plants have failed to scale or produce safe, useful products, and often create new pollution and toxic outputs.
Q: What is Greenpeace recommending instead of recycling?
A: Greenpeace calls for a dramatic shift toward reuse systems, standardized packaging, verified reporting, legislative action, and a total phase-out of single-use plastics.
Conclusion: The Urgent Need for Change
Greenpeace’s latest report provides overwhelming evidence that the US is not on a path toward a sustainable, circular plastic economy. With less than 6% of plastic being recycled and continuing toxicity and economic barriers, plastic recycling cannot solve the plastic pollution crisis.
Systemic change hinges on industry, policy makers, and consumers moving away from single-use plastics, embracing transparent reporting, and adopting robust reuse and refill systems. Only through collective action and a decisive shift in strategy can the US hope to address the mounting crisis of plastic waste.
References
- https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/11/greenpeace-report-most-plastic-not-recyclable/
- https://www.packagingdigest.com/sustainability/greenpeace-recycling-increases-the-toxicity-of-plastics
- https://phys.org/news/2022-10-plastic-recycling-myth-greenpeace.html
- https://resource-recycling.com/recycling/2022/10/25/greenpeace-report-no-us-plastic-is-truly-recyclable/
- https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/new-greenpeace-report-plastic-recycling-is-a-dead-end-street-year-after-year-plastic-recycling-declines-even-as-plastic-waste-increases/
- https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/category/plastics-campaign/myth-recycling/
- https://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/learn-about-plastic-pollution/
- https://ipen.org/news/new-greenpeace-report-calls-out-toxic-hazards-recycled-plastic
- https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-usa-stateless/2024/11/0ca48867-gpus_finalreport_2022.pdf
- https://thesustainableagency.com/blog/recycling-facts-and-statistics/
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
