Which Is Greener: Streaming Video or Watching a DVD?

Uncover the environmental impacts of video streaming and DVDs, from carbon emissions to energy use.

By Medha deb

Created on Sep 27, 2025

Uncover the environmental impacts of video streaming and DVDs, from carbon emissions to energy use.

The choice between streaming video and watching DVDs extends beyond convenience and cost. It raises an essential question of environmental impact. This article delves into the carbon footprint, energy usage, and sustainability issues involved in digitizing our viewing habits, weighing the ecological trade-offs of these two popular ways to enjoy movies and TV shows.

Understanding the Environmental Footprint of Video Consumption

Media consumption has shifted dramatically in the last two decades. The move from physical DVDs to digital streaming offers ease of access, but it also requires careful analysis of each method’s ecological consequences.

DVDs involve manufacturing, distribution, and, often, consumer car trips.
Streaming depends on vast digital infrastructure—servers, data centers, networks—and the end-user’s device.

The Lifecycle of a DVD

Physical DVDs have a unique lifecycle that spans several processes and phases:

Raw material extraction: Polycarbonate plastics (from petroleum), aluminum, and packaging.
Manufacturing: Use of resources and high-temperature processes to create the disc.
Packaging: Most DVDs use plastic jewel cases and shrink wrap, contributing to plastic waste.
Distribution: Logistics include warehouse storage, retail, and shipping or direct sales.
Consumer transportation: Trips to and from stores or rental locations (or mail for online rental).
End-of-life: Disposal or recycling; often, DVDs and cases end up in landfill.

The Lifecycle of Streaming Video

Streaming swaps physical goods for energy-intensive digital infrastructure:

Data centers: Billions of gigabytes of content are stored on thousands of servers, cooled and powered around the clock.
Network transmission: Energy is used to transmit data through internet cables, routers, and wireless towers.
End-user devices: TVs, laptops, tablets, and phones consume power to stream and display content.

Comparing Carbon Footprints: Streaming vs DVD

Scientific analyses provide insight into the relative carbon footprints of the two methods. A pivotal 2014 study from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimated:

One hour of video streaming requires about 7.9 megajoules (MJ) of energy and emits 0.4 kg of CO₂.
One hour of DVD viewing can consume up to 12 MJ and emit as much as 0.71 kg of CO₂, especially if the DVD is purchased or rented from a store involving car trips.

Media Type	Energy Use (MJ/hour)	CO₂ Emissions (kg/hour)
Streaming Video	7.9	0.4
DVD (Store Purchase/Rental)	Up to 12	Up to 0.71
DVD (Online Rental/Mail)	Similar to Streaming	Similar to Streaming

The crucial variables are end-user device efficiency and whether consumer driving is involved. If a DVD is ordered online or rented by mail, its footprint is comparable to streaming. However, store trips make DVDs significantly less green.

Key Factors Shaping Environmental Impact

1. Transportation and Distribution

Driving to stores to purchase or rent DVDs is particularly energy- and carbon-intensive, often overshadowing manufacturing and viewing energy.
Online purchasing or mail-based rental mitigates transport impacts but still requires delivery trucks and logistics, though less frequently per item than individual car trips.

2. Type and Efficiency of Devices

Modern laptops and tablets are much more efficient than older, high-power DVD players or large LCD TVs.
The energy savings of streaming are greatest when viewed on efficient devices.
Streaming’s carbon savings can be negated by watching on power-hungry home theaters or leaving devices running unnecessarily.

3. Network and Data Center Energy

Streaming’s environmental costs are largely due to the energy required to transmit data over the internet.
Data centers are surprisingly efficient: they account for less than 1% of energy use for streaming in some studies, thanks to advances in cooling and hardware efficiency.
However, as demand for high-definition and 4K content grows, so does the network burden.

How Much Greener Is Streaming?

The data suggest a significant potential for greenhouse gas reduction if DVD viewing is replaced by streaming:

A national 2011 scenario saw an estimated 2 billion kg of CO₂ and 30 PJ of energy saved if all DVD viewing had shifted to streaming.
This amount of energy could power approximately 200,000 US households for a year.
Streaming and mail-based DVD rental are the most efficient options, while store rentals/purchases have the highest impact due to transportation.

Quick Facts About Video Consumption in the US (2011)

1.2 billion DVDs purchased
17.2 billion hours of DVDs viewed
3.2 billion hours of movies and TV programs were streamed
Streaming device breakdown: 77% TV, 20% computer, 3% mobile

Are There Downsides to Streaming?

While streaming is usually more energy-efficient, its environmental impact is not insignificant—especially when video quality and overall consumption are taken into account.

As picture quality gets better (HD, 4K, HDR), data size increases, so each hour of streaming consumes more energy.
Rising demand means total energy consumption from streaming could exceed what DVDs used, even if streaming is greener per hour.
The constantly running nature of data centers and infrastructure for streaming increases baseline energy use, regardless of active viewing.

The “Rebound Effect”

A potential eco-pitfall is the rebound effect: as streaming becomes easier and cheaper, consumption rises. Streaming encourages viewers to watch more content than they did when renting or buying physical media. This increased demand can erode the environmental gains made by more efficient delivery methods.

How to Make Greener Choices as a Viewer

Whether you prefer streaming or DVDs, you can reduce your personal carbon impact by following a few best practices:

Use energy-efficient devices (such as tablets, laptops, and ENERGY STAR-rated TVs).
Lower screen brightness and avoid unnecessarily large screens or surround sound if possible.
Turn off devices when not in use—streaming often leads to devices left on standby or running in the background.
Opt for streaming in lower resolutions when high definition is not necessary, as data and energy use increases with image quality.
If you buy physical discs, group errands to cut down on car trips and recycle DVDs and cases when finished.

How Industry Can Help

Tech companies are improving data center efficiency with renewable energy, efficient cooling, and better hardware utilization.
Streaming platforms can offer default lower-resolution streams and tools for users to choose eco-friendly settings.
Device manufacturers can continue to lower power demands of TVs, streaming devices, and computers.
Networks and ISPs can invest in infrastructure upgrades that transmit data more efficiently with less energy loss.

Broader Context: Streaming Beyond Video

These findings are similar in the music industry. Physical formats like CDs have high manufacturing emissions, but the digital delivery of music now outweighs those emissions due to the sheer scale and energy use of streaming infrastructure. The lesson: efficiency in end devices and digital networks, coupled with renewable energy, is key across media types.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Is streaming video always greener than DVD viewing?

Streaming is typically greener, especially when compared to store-bought or rented DVDs that involve driving. However, the difference narrows for DVDs rented by mail or delivered online, and the benefit decreases as streaming quality and hours increase.

What is the largest environmental downside of DVDs?

The biggest contributor is driving to and from physical stores to rent or buy DVDs. The plastic waste associated with manufacturing and disposal is also significant.

Does the type of device I use for streaming matter?

Absolutely. Efficient devices like laptops and tablets consume less energy during playback. Large TVs or older media equipment use considerably more power.

Will streaming’s environmental impact grow in the future?

Yes. As people watch more content and video quality improves (4K, 8K), total energy and emissions from streaming are expected to increase. Continued efficiency improvements and renewable energy use are vital to mitigate this rise.

Can I recycle my DVDs?

Some recycling centers accept DVDs and cases, but many still end up in landfill due to mixed materials. Reuse, donation, or upcycling are greener alternatives if recycling isn’t available locally.

Conclusion

There is no single “greenest” option, but shifting from DVDs—especially in-store purchases and rentals—to streaming video generally reduces your carbon footprint. Still, all digital consumption comes with a cost. Choosing efficient devices, moderating total viewing time, and supporting industry efforts to run on clean energy will help minimize your environmental impact.

References

Author

medha deb

Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb