G7’s Pledge to End International Coal Financing: A Turning Point for Global Climate Action

G7 nations commit to ending coal financing, signaling a global shift towards net-zero emissions and sustainable energy.

By Medha deb

Created on Sep 27, 2025

G7 nations commit to ending coal financing, signaling a global shift towards net-zero emissions and sustainable energy.

G7 Countries Commit to Ending International Coal Financing

In a historic move, the Group of Seven (G7) countries have taken a decisive step toward climate leadership by committing to phase out international financing for coal-fired power plants and charting a path toward net-zero energy systems by 2050. This landmark agreement not only sets a precedent for developed nations but also signals a critical turning point in the global effort to limit greenhouse gas emissions and curb climate change.

What Is the G7 and Why Does Its Decision Matter?

The G7 is an informal bloc of wealthy democracies—Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States—that wields significant political and economic influence on the world stage. As highly industrialized nations, G7 members are major players in the energy sector and collectively responsible for substantial carbon emissions. Their coordinated decisions often set standards for other countries and the global marketplace.

Leadership Role: G7 countries have the financial and technological capacity to enact rapid change.
International Impact: Their collective action influences global policy trajectories, investments, and public perception on climate responsibility.

Setting a Timeline for the Coal Phase-Out

For the first time, the G7 as a group has agreed to a “timeframe” for phasing out unabated coal power generation by 2035. The agreement distinguishes between ‘unabated’ and ‘abated’ coal power—meaning that while coal plants with carbon capture and storage (CCS) might continue under strict scrutiny, conventional coal without emissions controls is targeted for phase-out (see FAQ: What is Abated vs. Unabated Coal?).

This timeline aligns with international scientific recommendations, which suggest that:

OECD countries—including G7 members—must end coal use by 2030,
and the rest of the world by 2040,
to keep global warming within the 1.5°C target set out by the Paris Agreement.

Key Elements of the G7’s 2024 Coal and Fossil Fuel Commitments

End of International Coal Financing: G7 countries will stop funding new coal projects abroad in 2024, closing a major loophole in the climate battle.
Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Renewed pledge to end “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies” by 2025, with increased accountability over the definition of such subsidies.
Decarbonized Power Sector Goal: Commitment to creating a “fully or predominantly decarbonized power sector by 2035.”
Renewable Energy Push: Support for COP28’s target of tripling global renewable energy capacity by 2030 and pursuing 1.5TW of energy storage by the same date.
Climate Finance: The G7 reaffirmed financial support for global transitions, emphasizing “Just Energy Transition Partnerships” with developing countries.

The Significance of the Phase-Out Decision

The G7 agreement marks a strategic pivot away from coal—a principal source of greenhouse gas emissions—and provides several crucial outcomes:

Signals Policy Certainty: A clear timeframe helps international markets and policymakers plan for a coal-free future.
Sets Global Standards: The G7’s example puts pressure on other high-income nations and international institutions to follow suit.
Encourages Innovation: Emphasis on energy storage, carbon capture, hydrogen, and biofuels spurs technological advancement.

Addressing Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Challenges and Progress

The G7’s longstanding commitment to end “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies” by 2025 has faced setbacks. Despite positive rhetoric, subsidies among G7 nations have increased in recent years—rising from USD 71 billion in 2016 to USD 282 billion in 2023.

Geopolitical Factors: The surge in subsidies is largely attributed to spiraling global energy prices and geopolitical shocks such as the war in Ukraine.
Types of Subsidy: Consumer subsidies aimed to shield households from costs, while producer subsidies (USD 11.4 billion in 2023) supported fossil fuel extraction and development.
Outlook: Experts recommend using periods of low oil prices to implement reforms and resist new subsidy programs, especially for fossil fuel producers.

Table: G7 Fossil Fuel Subsidies Over Time

Year	Total Subsidies (USD bn)
2016	71
2023	282

This trend highlights the importance of G7 accountability and transparent reporting mechanisms for tracking progress toward subsidy elimination.

The Just Transition: Global Support for Clean Energy

While G7 members move to phase out coal, developing countries—many of whom still rely on coal for affordable energy—face tougher choices. The G7 is addressing this “just transition” challenge by:

Financial Support: Launching and expanding Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs), with $47 billion already pledged to help countries like South Africa, Indonesia, and Vietnam move away from coal.
Technical Assistance: Sharing expertise on policy reform and clean energy investment.
Workforce Transition: Supporting training and job placement initiatives for workers and regions dependent on coal industries.

Experts argue that grant-based finance and innovative mechanisms are necessary to achieve faster, equitable decarbonization in the Global South.

How Is the G7 Tracking Progress and Enforcing Accountability?

Transparency and concrete policy enforcement are pivotal for translating G7 commitments into real-world results. The group has promised:

Periodic climate action updates, including progress evaluations on coal phase-out and the elimination of fossil fuel subsidies.
Common definitions for “inefficient” subsidies, enabling better public monitoring and national comparisons.
Submission of more ambitious nationally determined contributions (NDCs) in late 2024 or early 2025 as part of the Paris Agreement framework.

Implications for Global Energy Markets and Policy

The ripple effects of G7 action are expected to be profound, with consequences for:

Export Credit Policies: As the G7 ceases support for coal, international banks and private investors are likely to follow, making coal projects harder to finance.
Innovation Drive: Massive investments in renewable energy and storage technologies required to replace coal, with governments incentivizing research and deployment.
Market Signals: Clear signals to global energy markets that future growth lies in renewables, not fossil fuels.

Critics and Caveats: The Road Ahead

Despite strong language, some climate advocates warn that continued investment in “abated” coal (coal with carbon capture) and slow action on oil and gas subsidies could undermine the G7’s climate credibility. Questions remain about the sufficiency of pledged climate finance and the implementation speed of national policies.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is the difference between ‘unabated’ and ‘abated’ coal?

A: ‘Unabated’ coal refers to electricity generation from coal plants that do not use technologies to capture and store carbon dioxide emissions. ‘Abated’ coal could continue to operate if it deploys such technologies, though this approach remains controversial due to doubts about scalability and cost.

Q: Why is ending coal financing so important for the climate?

Coal is the largest single source of global greenhouse gas emissions. Transitioning away from coal to renewables is essential to keep global temperature rise within 1.5°C and avoid catastrophic climate impacts.

Q: Are G7 countries ending all fossil fuel subsidies?

Not entirely. The current pledge focuses on ending “inefficient” fossil fuel subsidies, but high energy prices and security concerns have led to increased subsidies in practice.

Q: What are Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs)?

JETPs are partnerships between developed countries (like G7 members) and developing economies to support a just and equitable transition from coal to clean energy. These partnerships combine financial, technical, and policy support. However, experts argue that current funding levels are not yet sufficient to meet needs.

Q: Will the G7 commitments affect developing countries?

Yes, indirectly. By ending support for new coal internationally and expanding grant-based climate finance, the G7 can help developing countries move away from coal without undermining their growth prospects or energy security.

Conclusion: Towards a Decarbonized Future

The G7’s agreement to end international coal financing and set a firm timeline for phasing out coal power marks a pivotal moment in the fight against climate change. While challenges in subsidy reform and climate finance remain, the G7’s leadership sets a strong example for major economies and paves the way for a rapid, global transition to affordable, reliable, and clean energy.

References

Author

medha deb

Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb