How Fashion Fuels Global Deforestation: Unraveling the Impact
Explore the hidden environmental cost of fashion’s favorite materials and their link to deforestation worldwide.
The Silent Crisis: Fashion’s Role in Global Deforestation
Forests are vital to life on Earth, providing clean air and water, storing vast amounts of carbon, guarding against climate change, and forming habitats for countless plant and animal species. Yet, a less discussed but significant threat to these ecosystems is the global fashion industry. From wood-based textiles to leather accessories, the true cost of fashion includes extensive destruction of forests, threatening biodiversity, Indigenous livelihoods, and the fight against climate change.
How Fashion Consumes Forests: Understanding the Connection
Fashion’s deforestation footprint is large and complex, rooted in the sourcing of materials that appear innocuous but conceal destructive supply chains. Two major sources are:
- Man-made cellulosic fibers, such as viscose, rayon, and modal, extracted from trees often logged in endangered or ancient forests.
- Leather, primarily from cattle raised on grazing land cleared from tropical forests, notably the Amazon basin.
According to the environmental organization Canopy, over 200 million trees are felled each year for cellulosic fabrics used in clothing, equivalent to enough trees to encircle the Earth seven times. Alarmingly, nearly 30% of viscose and rayon in fashion come from forests that are home to endangered species and irreplaceable biodiversity.
The Importance of Ancient and Endangered Forests
Ancient forests—those undisturbed for over a century—play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity and storing carbon. These forests are often targeted for logging because of their high-value wood, with less than 20% of such forests remaining intact. Loss of these forests leads to:
- Release of significant stored carbon, accelerating climate change.
- Collapse of habitats for rare species and Indigenous cultures.
- Degradation of water systems and reduction in climate resilience.
Wood-Based Textiles: Viscose, Rayon, and the Hidden Tree Cost
Viscose, rayon, modal, and lyocell are collectively known as man-made cellulosic fibers. Though often marketed as eco-friendly, these fabrics are derived from dissolving wood pulp. The demand for these textiles is surging, leading to:
- Ancient and endangered forests being harvested for wood pulp, particularly in Indonesia, Canada, Brazil, and parts of Eastern Europe.
- Monoculture tree plantations replacing rich, biodiverse native forests, undermining ecosystem functions and resilience.
Even if plantations are used, they often displace natural forests and wildlife. The creation of these materials also involves heavy chemical use, sometimes resulting in pollution and health risks for nearby communities.
Leather and the Amazon: Grazing Cattle, Clearing Forests
The Amazon Rainforest, often called the lungs of our planet, faces devastation largely due to cattle ranching. Leather, a highly profitable byproduct of the beef industry, is central to this process. Key facts:
- 80% of deforestation in the Amazon is linked to cattle ranching, implicating leather production alongside beef.
- Major fashion brands, both luxury and mainstream, have supply chains that intersect with Amazonian leather, including names like Adidas, Nike, Prada, Zara, Calvin Klein, and H&M.
What others are reading
Both legal and illegal methods contribute to forest loss. Deliberate fires and unlawful land clearing are rampant, threatening not only biodiversity but also the rights and territories of Indigenous peoples. In Australia, similar patterns occur, with cattle and sheep farming responsible for over 90% of deforestation in Queensland, killing millions of native animals and decimating important habitats, such as those crucial for koalas.
The Global Complications of Fashion’s Supply Chains
The globalized nature of fashion means raw materials often travel through convoluted, opaque supply chains before becoming finished products. This obfuscation makes it difficult to trace the true environmental and social cost of clothing and accessories. In many countries, such as Cambodia and Indonesia, illegal logging not only strips forests but fuels garment factories using wood for power and steam. These supply chains are so complex that even brands touting sustainability struggle to guarantee deforestation-free production.
Sustainability Claims and Supply Chain Opacity
- Large brands often lack transparency or accountability in monitoring raw material origins.
- Even factories using certified materials (such as Leather Working Group certified leather) may still participate in deforestation through indirect suppliers or blended supply chains.
- Auditing and technological solutions (e.g., traceability apps) exist but can be bypassed, and effective oversight is often undermined by weak regulations and enforcement.
Deforestation’s Far-Reaching Impacts
Clearing forests for fashion materials undermines critical planetary functions and has cascading effects:
- Biodiversity Loss: Forests host the majority of terrestrial wildlife species, including many that are endangered. Deforestation fragments habitats, disrupts migration, and leads to extinction.
- Climate Change: Forests lock away billions of tons of carbon. Their destruction releases this carbon back into the atmosphere, contributing to global warming.
- Indigenous Rights: Many forested areas are homelands for Indigenous peoples. Land clearing for fashion displaces communities, erodes cultures, and violates rights.
- Social Instability: Rural communities lose land, face poverty, and may get lured into illegal logging for survival income.
- Soil and Water Degradation: Removing tree cover weakens natural protections, causing erosion, sedimentation of rivers, and less reliable water cycles.
Which Fashion Materials Cause the Most Harm?
Some fashion materials are significantly more destructive than others. The primary culprits include:
| Material | Main Forest Impact | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Viscose/Rayon | High | Made from pulp of ancient/primary forests; lack of transparency in sourcing |
| Leather | Very High | Linked to large-scale Amazon & Australian deforestation |
| Rubber | Moderate | Grown in clear-cut tropical forests, esp. Southeast Asia |
| Paper/Cardboard Packaging | Moderate | Unsustainable sources contribute indirectly to deforestation |
Accountability: Why Aren’t Brands Doing More?
Despite mounting evidence, fashion brands often respond with silence or surface-level sustainability pledges:
- Supply chain opacity helps avoid responsibility for sourcing practices.
- Few brands have robust, publicly available tracing systems for tree-derived or leather materials.
- Third-party certifications help but aren’t foolproof; sourcing loopholes and policy weaknesses remain.
- Activist investigations and public pressure sometimes prompt incremental changes, but progress is slow and uneven across the industry.
Corporate policies often focus more on packaging and paper products than the actual fibers and materials in garments. Lack of clear standards for what constitutes “unacceptable sources” further blurs accountability and leaves room for destructive practices.
Hope on the Horizon: Solutions for a Forest-Friendly Fashion Industry
While the challenges are immense, pathways exist for transforming fashion into a force for forest conservation:
- Stronger and transparent supply chain tracing, enabled by blockchain or comprehensive audit trails accessible to the public.
- Adoption of responsible sourcing policies that explicitly exclude material from endangered or ancient forests and support forest restoration.
- Investing in alternative materials, such as recycled fibers, agricultural waste fabrics, or plant-based leathers that do not require deforestation.
- Support for Indigenous and local stewardship of forests, recognizing their knowledge and custodianship in protecting landscapes.
- Consumer activism: Mindful purchasing, supporting brands with verifiable forest-friendly policies, and pressuring laggards to improve transparency.
Nonprofits like Canopy have led major campaigns encouraging brands to sign Forest Stewardship Pledges and move toward truly sustainable sourcing for all wood-derived products.
What Can Consumers Do?
Individual choices may seem small, but when multiplied, they create a substantial impact. Consider the following:
- Prioritize clothing and accessories that use certified or alternative materials, such as recycled viscose, organic cotton, or plant-based leather alternatives.
- Research brand policies regarding forest-friendly sourcing. Look for transparent disclosure of supply chains and independent certification.
- Support campaigns demanding fashion brands eliminate forest destruction from their products.
- Reduce consumption and focus on quality and longevity over fast fashion cycles.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Why is viscose production linked to deforestation?
A: Viscose is made from wood pulp, and unsustainable sourcing often means logging ancient or endangered forests to produce it. Many supply chains lack transparency, making it difficult to discern whether sourcing is sustainable.
Q: Are leather products always connected to deforestation?
A: Most leather in fashion is a byproduct of cattle ranching, often tied directly to deforestation in the Amazon and other tropical areas. Without robust sourcing standards, most fashion leather cannot guarantee it is not linked to forest loss.
Q: How can consumers know if a brand is forest-friendly?
A: Look for brands that disclose their fiber and leather supply chains, use third-party certifications, and participate in transparent forest protection initiatives, such as those led by Canopy or Rainforest Alliance.
Q: Do plant-based leathers solve the problem?
A: Some plant-based leathers use agricultural waste and do not require additional land clearing, making them more sustainable. Always check for independent verification, as some alternatives may rely on intensive resource use or hazardous chemicals.
Q: Is fashion’s role in deforestation improving?
A: Growing awareness and advocacy have moved some brands to improve policies and traceability, but the pace is slow, and the industry as a whole remains a major driver of deforestation.
Final Thoughts: Can Sustainable Fashion Save Our Forests?
The fashion industry wields immense influence over the fate of forests. Its future choices—backed by consumer demand and robust policy action—will determine whether forests continue to vanish for fleeting trends or are preserved for generations to come. Every decision to prioritize transparency, source responsibly, and support the guardians of forests brings hope for a more ethical and sustainable industry where fashion and forests coexist.
References
- https://www.sustainably-chic.com/blog/how-the-fashion-industry-contributes-to-deforestation
- https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/forests-furnace-can-fashion-brands-tackle-illegal-logging-their-cambodian-supply-chains
- https://www.sustainabilityforstudents.com/post/fashion-s-footprint-in-our-forests
- https://www.americanforests.org/article/fashion-food-a-guide-to-forest-friendly-shopping/
- https://www.thefashionpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/fashion-sector-future-scenarios-analyses.pdf
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
