Home » Environment

E-Bikers Go Farther, Ride More, and Still Get Great Exercise

E-bikes boost travel distances, ride frequency, and health—debunking myths about 'cheating' and redefining urban mobility.

By Medha deb

Created on Sep 27, 2025

E-bikes boost travel distances, ride frequency, and health—debunking myths about 'cheating' and redefining urban mobility.

E-bikes have swiftly redefined urban transport and fitness, turning heads with claims that e-bikers ride farther, more frequently, and with comparable health benefits to traditional cyclists. Recent studies are overturning persistent myths about e-bikes, showing that this technology not only supports sustainability but also promotes public health, accessibility, and even a shift away from private car use. Here, we examine the latest findings, dispel old misconceptions, and explore how e-bikes are revolutionizing cycling and daily transportation.

Debunking the ‘Cheating’ Myth: E-Bikes and Physical Activity

An enduring criticism of e-bikes is that electric assistance reduces the physical effort required, making it an inferior form of exercise—some even call it ‘cheating.’ However, research shows this assumption is unfounded. According to a major study covering European e-bike users, riders of pedal-assist e-bikes (pedelecs) measured very similar levels of physical activity—using the Metabolic Equivalent Task minutes per week (MET min/wk)—to those of conventional cyclists. E-bikers averaged 4,463 MET min/wk compared to 4,085 MET min/wk for traditional cyclists. This means that despite the motor assist, the overall exertion per week is on par for both groups, thanks largely to changes in riding patterns and trip length.

Key Points About E-Bikes and Exercise

E-bikers get as much total exercise as regular cyclists due to longer or more frequent rides.
The intensity may be slightly lower per trip, but the total amount of physical activity is equivalent.
E-biking often leads to a shift from cars or public transport, netting large gains in weekly physical activity. Switching from cars to e-bikes provides an average gain of 550–800 MET min/week.

E-Bike Users: Who Are They and How Do They Ride?

The profile of the average e-biker differs slightly from that of a traditional cyclist. E-biking tends to attract:

Older users (average age around 48 vs. 41 for non-electric cyclists)
Riders with higher car access and higher BMI (body mass index: e-bikers average 24.8, cyclists 23.8, both in the normal range)
People looking for a less physically arduous but still active mobility alternative

Despite these differences, e-bikers demonstrate a marked boost in both how far and how often they ride, making these bikes a vital tool for potentially less active groups and those who would otherwise drive.

E-Bikers Cover More Ground and Replace Car Trips

Studies show that e-bike trips are consistently longer than those of conventional cycles:

Average distance per e-bike trip: 9.4 km (bicycles by e-bikers: 8.4 km; bicycles by non-e-bikers: 4.8 km)
Daily distance by e-bike: 8.0 km/person; by bicycle: 5.3 km/person

The capacity to ride greater distances, face fewer barriers related to hills or fatigue, and commute faster means e-bikes are especially effective at replacing short car trips, especially among those not already cycling regularly. Countries like Denmark have reported that the average new e-bike user cuts their driving by nearly 49% and their public transit use by 48%—a major modal shift toward sustainability.

Major Findings

E-bike owners ride longer distances on average than cyclists who use only non-electric bicycles
E-biking leads to a more frequent use of the bicycle as a means of daily transport, translating into more exercise and less reliance on cars
The boost in exercise and drop in car usage is considered a significant public health win

Infrastructure and Policy: Planning for an E-Bike Boom

As e-bikes grow in popularity, urban planners, governments, and mobility advocates face new challenges—and opportunities. To maximize the health, environmental, and mobility benefits of e-bikes, cities must:

Expand and adapt cycling infrastructure to accommodate more users and increased average speeds
Update safety measures and rules for diverse bike technologies
Consider policy shifts such as including e-bikes in mobility subsidies and incentives, rather than focusing solely on electric cars
Design systems that prioritize active travel and minimize conflicts between users

Effective e-bike policy not only improves transport efficiency but actively supports public health and reduces congestion and noise.

Why Europe’s E-Bike Rules Are Working

The European approach—limiting e-bike output to 250 watts, requiring pedal-assist (“pedelec”) technology, and capping top speeds—has kept physical activity levels high while making e-biking pleasant yet effective. This stands in contrast to some American models with throttles and higher power, which may reduce activity and blur the line between bicycles and motorbikes.

Pedelec e-bikes require continuous pedaling—ensuring users get moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, not a motorcycle-like ride
The design encourages regular exercise, longer commutes, and safe speeds in mixed-use urban environments

This approach allows for fitness benefits, increased accessibility for older or less fit riders, and a safer integration into city cycling infrastructure.

The Social and Environmental Impacts of E-Bikes

Switching to e-bikes doesn’t just benefit individuals; it has broad societal implications:

Reduces greenhouse gas emissions by replacing car trips
Lowers noise pollution in cities and neighborhoods
Improves public health outcomes as more people become active commuters
Increases accessibility for older adults and those with physical limitations

The evidence suggests that promoting e-bikes could help cities make meaningful progress toward climate and health goals, especially when e-bikes are supported by robust and safe cycling infrastructure.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Do e-bike riders get less exercise than regular cyclists?

A: No. Studies indicate that e-bike riders, on average, get similar levels of exercise as traditional cyclists because they go farther and ride more frequently, compensating for the electric assist.

Q: What kind of trips are e-bikes most likely to replace?

A: E-bikes most commonly replace short to medium car journeys—typically under 10 km—making them an excellent tool for reducing urban congestion and emissions.

Q: Are e-bikes suitable for older adults or those with lower fitness?

A: Yes. E-bikes are especially effective at enabling older adults and those with mobility limitations to cycle longer distances, increase their activity level, and maintain independence.

Q: How do policymakers ensure e-bikes contribute positively to health and cities?

A: By focusing on pedal-assist technology, speed limits, and by investing in expanded, safer cycling networks for all types of bicycles, cities can ensure e-bikes remain both a health-promoting and sustainable mobility choice.

Comparison Table: E-Bikes vs. Regular Bikes—By the Numbers

Feature	E-Bike Users	Regular Cyclists
Average Trip Distance	9.4 km (8.4 km on regular bike)	4.8 km
Average Daily Distance	8.0 km/person	5.3 km/person
Physical Activity (MET min/wk)	4,463	4,085
Average Age	48.1 years	41.4 years
BMI (Body Mass Index)	24.8	23.8
Main Substitute Transportation	Car/Public Transport	Walking/Cycling

Final Thoughts: Embracing the E-Bike Revolution

The e-bike boom is more than a passing trend—it’s a seismic shift in how cities and individuals approach mobility, health, and sustainability. With evidence mounting that e-bikes enable people to ride farther, more often, and with health gains equivalent to (or greater than) non-electric cycling—for a broader spectrum of users—the case for their promotion grows ever stronger.

To fully realize the promise of e-bikes, communities must:

Integrate motorcycles and bicycles into shared infrastructure safely
Encourage active commuting through supportive policies and incentives
Keep health, sustainability, and equity at the center of urban transport planning

Whether for health or convenience, pleasure or planet, e-bikes are helping a wider group of people get moving—and stay moving—for a healthier, more sustainable future.

References

Author

medha deb

Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb