Home » Environment

Understanding Direct Air Capture: Technology, Challenges, and Potential

Direct air capture is revolutionizing climate solutions, but it comes with steep costs, technological hurdles, and a promising future for carbon removal.

By Sneha Tete, Integrated MA, Certified Relationship Coach

Created on Sep 27, 2025

Direct air capture is revolutionizing climate solutions, but it comes with steep costs, technological hurdles, and a promising future for carbon removal.

What Is Direct Air Capture?

Direct Air Capture (DAC) is an innovative technology designed to remove carbon dioxide (CO₂) directly from the atmosphere, providing a potential tool for addressing global warming and striving toward net-zero emissions. Unlike traditional carbon capture methods that target emissions at the source, DAC works independently of where emissions originate, enabling the removal of legacy and dispersed CO₂ emissions.

Purpose: DAC helps reduce atmospheric CO₂ levels, playing a direct role in climate mitigation strategies.
Difference from Point Source Capture: Instead of capturing CO₂ at power plants or industrial sites, DAC extracts it from ambient air, making it particularly useful for non-stationary and historic emissions.

How Does Direct Air Capture Work?

The DAC process is a blend of engineering and chemistry, facilitated by large machines designed to interact with vast volumes of air. Notably, DAC typically follows these main steps:

Air Intake: Large fans draw ambient air into the DAC facility.
CO₂ Separation: Air passes through a contactor containing a chemical medium (either a liquid solvent or solid sorbent). The medium selectively reacts with CO₂ and captures it.
Regeneration & CO₂ Collection: Once the medium is saturated with CO₂, heat, pressure, or other methods are applied to release the pure CO₂, regenerating the capture medium for reuse.
Storage or Utilization: The isolated CO₂ is compressed and either stored underground or converted into useful products.

Key DAC Technologies

Two main technological approaches dominate the field:

Liquid Solvent Systems: Air is bubbled through a liquid solution (often containing potassium hydroxide or amines) that binds with CO₂. The resulting solution is processed to release and recover CO₂, while regenerating the solvent for another cycle.
Solid Sorbent Systems: Air passes over solid materials (such as resins or modified silica) that chemically or physically bind CO₂. Heat or vacuum is then used to extract the CO₂ from the sorbent, which is also regenerated for reuse.

Direct Air Capture vs. Other Carbon Capture Approaches

Aspect	Direct Air Capture (DAC)	Point-Source Carbon Capture
Source of CO₂	Ambient Air	Industrial emitters (power/factories)
CO₂ Concentration	~0.04% (400 ppm)	5-15% in flue gas
Purpose	Removes legacy/historic emissions	Prevents new emissions
Deployment	Anywhere, not site-limited	At emission sources only
Energy Requirement Per Ton	High	Lower (per ton, due to higher concentration)

Why Direct Air Capture Matters

DAC is gaining increasing attention due to its potential to address complications in current carbon management efforts:

Helps offset “hard-to-abate” emissions from aviation, shipping, and dispersed sources.
Offers a path to remove legacy carbon from the atmosphere, undoing some accumulated environmental damage.
Can work in tandem with other climate solutions, such as renewable energy and reforestation.
Plays a strategic role in achieving “net-zero” or even “net-negative” emissions targets worldwide.

Potential Applications for Captured CO₂

The CO₂ extracted by DAC does not simply disappear. Its next destination determines the climate impact:

Geological Storage: Injection of CO₂ into deep underground rock formations—considered the most permanent solution for keeping CO₂ out of the atmosphere.
Utilization: CO₂ can be converted into fuels, construction materials (like concrete), chemicals, or used for enhanced oil recovery.
Short-term Uses: In beverages or synthetic fuels, the CO₂ will eventually be re-released, offering less climate benefit than permanent storage.

The Scale of the Challenge

DAC holds immense promise, but is not without limitations—especially related to scale and cost. To make a significant dent in global CO₂ emissions, the scale of DAC deployment must be massive, with millions or even billions of tons removed annually.

Currently, only a handful of commercial DAC facilities exist worldwide, with the largest removing less than 50,000 tons of CO₂ per year.
To meet climate goals, the International Energy Agency estimates the need for DAC to remove 85 million tons of CO₂ per year by 2030, and potentially billions by 2050.

Costs and Energy Requirements

One of the main obstacles to DAC is its expense and energy demand:

Current Cost: Estimates range from $100 to over $1,000 per ton of CO₂ removed, with costs typically much higher for smaller or first-of-its-kind plants.
Future Cost Targets: Many experts aim for costs below $100/ton as scaling, innovation, and policy support advance.
Energy Use: DAC is energy-intensive, especially when extracting the dilute CO₂ present in ambient air (<0.04%). Powering DAC with renewable energy is essential to avoid undermining the climate benefit.

Environmental and Social Considerations

Land and Water Use: Depending on the technology, DAC facilities require space and sometimes considerable water, potentially impacting local environments.
Materials Footprint: Production and transport of chemicals or sorbents used in DAC systems involve their own emissions and resource demands.
Community Impact: DAC plants can create local jobs but may also provoke concerns about siting, aesthetics, and environmental justice.

Direct Air Capture: Opportunities and Drawbacks

Opportunities

Versatile placement—can be deployed where renewable energy and geological storage are accessible.
Offers a scalable, technologically driven approach to climate mitigation.
Potential for integrating with established industries and new carbon markets.

Drawbacks

High cost remains a major limiting factor.
Still in early stages of deployment and demonstration; not yet proven at global scale.
Requires substantial infrastructure, energy, and resource investment.
Risk of relying on future DAC instead of prioritizing emission reductions now.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the difference between DAC and other Negative Emissions Technologies?

DAC directly removes CO₂ from air, while other methods like bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) use biological systems to take up CO₂ first, then capture it from those processes. DAC is technology-based and does not require large-scale land use for biomass production.

How permanent is CO₂ storage via DAC?

If CO₂ is injected into suitable deep geological formations, storage can be effectively permanent for centuries or longer, with careful monitoring and management.

Is DAC a replacement for emission reductions?

No. Experts emphasize that DAC is a complement to, not a substitute for, rapid emissions reductions. It addresses residual or hard-to-abate emissions and legacy carbon, not the primary source of atmospheric CO₂.

Who is investing in direct air capture?

Private companies (like Carbon Engineering, Climeworks, and global energy firms), governments (especially the US Department of Energy), and venture investors are leading efforts to advance and scale up the technology.

How soon will DAC become widespread?

Widespread deployment relies on further cost reductions, supportive policies, reliable CO₂ storage options, and continued technological progress. While pilot and small-scale commercial plants are operational now, it will likely take until 2030-2040 for large-scale impact.

The Future of Direct Air Capture

As the world races to limit warming to 1.5°C or 2°C, DAC could prove vital to counterbalance sectors that cannot fully eliminate emissions and to draw down accumulated atmospheric carbon. Policy, innovation, and public investment will shape its trajectory.

The US Department of Energy’s “Carbon Negative Shot” aims to achieve large-scale, affordable DAC (<$100/ton) by mid-century.
International agreements and carbon markets could further incentivize responsible DAC deployment.

Ultimately, while DAC is not a silver bullet, it is a critical piece of the complex puzzle for climate stabilization—a backup we may not be able to afford to ignore.

References

Author

Sneha TeteBeauty & Lifestyle Writer

Sneha is a relationships and lifestyle writer with a strong foundation in applied linguistics and certified training in relationship coaching. She brings over five years of writing experience to thebridalbox, crafting thoughtful, research-driven content that empowers readers to build healthier relationships, boost emotional well-being, and embrace holistic living.

Read full bio of Sneha Tete