Deforestation and Mining Surge in Tropical Forests During COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated illegal mining and deforestation in tropical countries, revealing vulnerabilities in forest protection and global conservation efforts.

By Medha deb
Created on

The COVID-19 pandemic radically altered the global landscape, affecting not just public health and economies, but also intensifying threats to tropical forests through a surge in deforestation and illegal mining. The consequences for biodiversity, climate, and indigenous livelihoods have proved profound, as enforcement waned and demand for natural resources persisted.

The Pandemic: A Watershed Moment for Forests

As nations locked down in response to COVID-19, hopes initially ran high that environmental pressures would decrease due to restricted movement and slowed economies. However, the opposite occurred across many tropically forested countries. Reduced law enforcement, economic hardship, and persistent commodity demand created fertile ground for illegal extraction and intensified forest loss.

The Global Patterns: Where Deforestation and Mining Increased

  • Brazil: Notable increases in deforestation were observed, with preexisting trends accelerating due to government deregulation and weakened environmental institutions. The Amazon Basin saw rampant illegal logging, land grabbing, and mining activities continue even at the height of the pandemic.
  • Indonesia and Malaysia: Southeast Asia experienced a rise in timber logging and mining, especially in islands like Sulawesi where illegal timber extraction soared by 70% in 2020.
  • Africa: East, West, Central, and Southern Africa saw higher illegal logging rates; Tanzania experienced a 20% surge in illegal felling, with similar reports in Kenya, Uganda, and the Congo Basin.
  • South America: Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador witnessed increased illicit mining and logging, with the Choco and Amazon regions notably affected.
  • South Asia: Nepal reported a 227% increase in timber theft in protected areas during the first lockdown month, and crime linked to natural resources spiked dramatically.

Spotlight: Case Study of Siamese Rosewood Trafficking

In May 2020, eight workers were arrested in Thailand for illegally extracting a valuable Siamese rosewood tree from a wildlife sanctuary—a stark illustration of continued illegal activity despite restrictions. Demand for rosewood, driven largely by China’s luxury furniture market, has made it the world’s most trafficked wild product, emphasizing how criminal syndicates exploit moments of reduced oversight.

Underlying Drivers: Why Did Deforestation and Mining Escalate?

  • Reduced Monitoring and Enforcement:

    The diversion of government resources to managing the health crisis led to diminished forest protection and fewer staff on the ground, allowing criminal syndicates and opportunistic actors to increase illegal activities.

  • Economic Pressures and Unemployment:

    Job losses and economic recession motivated many, particularly rural and displaced urban populations, to turn to forests for timber, mining, and food, thereby increasing pressure on natural resources.

  • Persistent and Rising Commodity Demand:

    The value of forest products and minerals remained strong, especially in international markets, incentivizing illegal extraction despite travel, border, and supply chain restrictions.

  • Return to Rural Areas:

    Lockdown-induced migration saw workers move back to rural communities, driving agricultural expansion and logging as subsistence strategies.

  • Deregulation and Policy Gaps:

    Some governments responded to economic crises by loosening environmental protections, dismantling conservation agencies, and delaying or reversing enforcement efforts.

Impacts on Biodiversity and Local Communities

The surge in illegal mining and deforestation during the pandemic had cascading effects on biodiversity, indigenous groups, and marginalized forest-dependent populations. Loss of habitat and species, degradation of ecosystem services, and erosion of local food security compounded vulnerabilities.

  • Biodiversity Loss: Increased forest clearing and mining led to direct destruction of habitats, threatening endangered plants and animal species, particularly those already facing extinction risks.
  • Indigenous and Rural Livelihoods: Many indigenous and local communities depend on intact forests for sustenance, culture, and health. Increased extraction disrupted traditional activities and created conflict over resource use.
  • Ecosystem Services: Forests provide flood regulation, carbon sequestration, and water purification—functions compromised by large-scale illegal activities and ecosystem fragmentation.

Table: Major Regions Impacted and Primary Illegal Activities During COVID-19

RegionMain Illegal ActivitiesReported % IncreaseNotable Outcomes
Brazil / AmazonLogging, land grabbing, miningSignificant (exact % varies by state)Rapid forest loss, violence against defenders
Indonesia (Sulawesi)Timber extraction, poaching70%Loss of primary rainforest, income for criminal networks
Central AfricaLogging, poaching, charcoal production20% (Tanzania), Unquantified (Kenya/Uganda)Revenue loss, degraded mangroves
NepalTimber theft, illegal harvesting227% (Protected areas)Biodiversity loss in conservation zones
Peru/EcuadorMining, illegal loggingUnquantified spikes reportedPollution and community displacement

Policy Responses and Conservation Challenges

The pandemic revealed significant gaps in global forest governance. Conservation NGOs and international organizations warned that emergency-driven easing of environmental policy, coupled with a shift in government priorities, could lead to long-term setbacks in conservation progress. Despite some calls for “green recoveries,” most regions faced reduced funding, delayed restoration projects, and shrinking protected area management.

  • Protection agencies struggled to maintain staff and oversight, especially as budgets dwindled and travel restrictions took hold.
  • Environmental defenders experienced increased threats, reduced support, and higher rates of confrontations with criminal actors.
  • The delay and cancellation of major climate and biodiversity summits hampered the setting of new global targets for deforestation and restoration, undermining coordinated conservation efforts.
  • Recession in restoration activities was observed due to the high costs and interrupted supply chains for reforestation projects.

Socioeconomic Effects: The Livelihood Crisis

Forestry sector workers, small-scale farmers, and indigenous communities faced declining incomes, market access disruptions, and greater competition for scarce resources. Governments lost significant revenues from legal timber and mineral trade, further deepening the economic crisis in already vulnerable tropical countries.

  • Distorted supply chains caused timber prices to fluctuate and diminished trade volume, affecting national budgets and rural wages.
  • Illegal mining operations polluted waterways and soils, damaging crops and increasing health risks for nearby populations.
  • Women and minority groups bore disproportionate hardship, with food insecurity and threats to traditional economies threatening long-term wellbeing.

Green Recovery or Regression?

While some policymakers and advocates championed the idea of a “green recovery”—using the pandemic as an opportunity to promote sustainable economic reforms—most evidence suggests that emergency economic policies prioritized immediate financial relief over environmental guarantees. Concerns remain that weakened regulatory frameworks, reduced compliance, and restored demand will entrench deforestation trends for years to come.

  • Efforts to reboot economies often included deregulation of environmental standards, facilitating easier access for businesses to forested and mineral-rich lands.
  • Short-term investment in infrastructure and extraction frequently outweighed support for renewable energy or conservation jobs.
  • As COVID-19 moved from crisis phase to endemic management, promises for environmental reform remain uneven and slow to materialize.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Did deforestation rates increase globally because of COVID-19?

A: Yes, multiple sources indicate significant rises in deforestation rates across Brazil, Indonesia, Africa, and South America during the pandemic, driven by loss of oversight and economic pressures.

Q: What were the main drivers of illegal mining and logging during the pandemic?

A: Reduced law enforcement, financial hardship, high commodity demand, policy deregulation, and rural migration were principal drivers for both illegal mining and logging activity.

Q: Has the loss of forests affected biodiversity and climate?

A: Yes, rapid forest clearing and increased mining have led to habitat destruction, endangered species loss, and weakened ecosystem services like flood control, carbon sequestration, and water purification.

Q: Did governments respond to the surge in illegal activities?

A: Responses varied, but in most cases, conservation enforcement weakened due to redirected attention and financial constraints. Environmental groups called for stronger protective measures but faced many challenges.

Q: Are there signs of recovery or improvement post-pandemic?

A: While discussions about green recovery are ongoing, practical change has been slow. Restoration projects and better governance are needed to reverse damage and protect vulnerable forests for the future.

Key Takeaways for the Future

  • COVID-19 has exposed and exacerbated vulnerabilities in global forest conservation systems, especially in tropical regions.
  • Sustained international cooperation and investment in enforcement, restoration, and community support are critical to reverse the damage and build resilience against future crises.
  • Protecting tropical forests is integral not only for biodiversity but also for food security, climate stability, and sustainable development.
Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb