How Californians Without Rooftop Solar Subsidize the Solar Boom

In California, non-solar utility customers pay substantial annual subsidies to support rooftop solar panel owners.

By Medha deb

Created on Sep 27, 2025

In California, non-solar utility customers pay substantial annual subsidies to support rooftop solar panel owners.

California stands at the forefront of the rooftop solar revolution, with more home solar panel systems installed than any other state. But even as residential solar generation helps support the state’s climate goals, it has sparked a fierce debate over who pays—and who benefits. Out of sight for many homeowners, billions of dollars flow each year from utility customers who lack rooftop solar to those who have installed it, raising pressing questions about fairness, affordability, and the future of California’s energy system.

Why Rooftop Solar Matters in California

California’s ambitious clean energy targets have made rooftop solar a centerpiece of its transition away from fossil fuels. With generous state programs and federal incentives, solar adoption has surged, and the environmental benefits are evident in reduced greenhouse gas emissions, improved air quality, and less strain on traditional power plants.

Leading U.S. Conversion Rate: Over 11% of single-family homes now sport solar panels, the highest share in the country.
Climate Commitment: California’s climate action plan calls for 100% clean electricity by 2045.
Cost Savings: Homeowners who install solar panels see dramatically lower energy bills.

The Hidden Subsidy: Who Really Pays?

Despite rooftop solar’s popularity, its growth is underwritten by a vast—and largely invisible—shift in costs. Utility customers without solar panels are effectively subsidizing those who own them, largely due to how electricity rates and incentives are structured.

Annual Bill: According to state regulators and industry analyses, non-solar households pay an estimated $3.4 billion a year in extra utility charges to offset the savings enjoyed by their solar neighbors.
Monthly Impact: This translates to around $200 per year in extra charges for the average non-solar home.
Total Affected: Roughly four out of five single-family households are still without rooftop solar, making them the main bearers of these costs.

How Does This Subsidy Work?

The dynamic roots from what’s known as net energy metering (NEM). Under NEM, homeowners with rooftop solar panels are credited for the electricity they generate and send to the grid. These credits are granted at or near the full retail rate of electricity—the same price other customers pay to buy power. This means:

Solar owners lower their energy payments to utilities, sometimes to near zero.
Utilities collect less revenue from rooftop solar owners.
To recover fixed system costs (for wires, maintenance, wildfire prevention, etc.), utilities must shift charges onto those who don’t have panels.

Who Bears the Financial Burden?

The structure of California’s utility rates means that the expenses to maintain, expand, and secure the grid—including investments in wildfire mitigation, power line upgrades, and billing—are spread across all customers. But as more households go solar, that burden increasingly falls on those who cannot or do not install solar on their roofs.

Low- and moderate-income families, renters, and elderly residents are far less likely to own solar panels.
State data suggests that rooftop solar adopters are disproportionately high-income homeowners.
As more affluent customers exit the cost pool, the fixed costs grow for the remaining non-solar ratepayers.

California Solar Incentives: How They Work

California has pioneered some of the most aggressive solar incentives in the country. Many of these programs dramatically reduce the cost of installing panels, but their benefits are not distributed equally.

Key Incentive Programs

Federal Residential Clean Energy Tax Credit (formerly ITC): Reduces up to 30% of the cost of a home solar panel system, including equipment, labor, and permitting fees. Available only through the end of 2025, this credit has saved Californians thousands on installations.
Disadvantaged Communities – Single-family Affordable Solar Homes (DAC-SASH): Targets low-income families in communities most impacted by pollution. Offers an incentive worth $3 per watt for systems between 1 and 5 kW, reducing upfront installation costs by as much as $15,000.
PACE Financing (Property Assessed Clean Energy): Lets homeowners install solar with no upfront cash and repay the cost over 10–20 years via property taxes.
Local Utility Rebates: Additional incentives, typically up to $500, are sometimes available from local utilities.
Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP): Offers cash incentives for installing battery storage and paired solar-storage systems, particularly benefitting low-income and underserved customers.

Are Incentives Equitable?

While large state and federal subsidies help offset installation costs, these programs predominantly benefit those who can afford to own their homes, obtain financing, and take advantage of tax credits. Renters and those with lower credit scores see little to no direct benefit.

How Utility Rate Structures Fuel the Subsidy

California’s three major investor-owned utilities—Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), Southern California Edison (SCE), and San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E)—use a tiered rate system. Most of the costs for grid maintenance, fire safety, and universal access are paid through per-kilowatt-hour charges rather than fixed monthly fees. Because net-metered solar customers buy so little power, they contribute minimally to these shared costs.

Solar Savings: Rooftop solar cut an average household’s annual utility bill by 60–90%.
Non-Solar Share: Those savings are offset by higher volumetric rates charged to non-solar customers, meaning they pay more for grid costs and even the implementation of solar programs themselves.

The Size of the Subsidy Problem

Item	Solar Households	Non-Solar Households
Share of California Homes	~1 out of 5	~4 out of 5
Annual Benefit per Solar Household	About $1,500-2,500	n/a
Annual Subsidy Paid by Non-Solar Households	//	About $3.4 billion in total
Impact on Low-Income Customers	Rarely solar panel owners	Bearing disproportionate cost increases

The Policy Tug of War: Rethinking Solar Subsidies

As California’s rooftop solar buildout accelerates, policymakers, utilities, and advocates are wrestling with how to balance the urgent need for clean energy against the growing inequity in who pays for it. Proposals for reform have ranged from modifying net metering rates to instituting flat monthly grid charges.

Key Policy Debates

Grid Access Charges: Some propose a fixed monthly fee for all solar customers to ensure that they contribute to basic grid maintenance and reliability.
Value-Based Compensation: Others favor lowering compensation for solar exports to better reflect their value to the grid, rather than the retail price.
Targeted Aid for Low-Income Families: Expanding existing incentives or creating new programs so the solar benefits can reach new communities, not just the affluent.

Arguments For and Against the Status Quo

Proponents of current NEM: Argue that generous net metering is essential to solar adoption and that the system still provides value in environmental and avoided infrastructure costs—even if some cross-subsidization occurs.
Utility and equity advocates: Counter that costs are spiraling unsustainably, unfairly penalizing lower-income and solar-excluded households, and undermining necessary investments in the grid.

Is There an Equitable Way Forward?

Experts increasingly argue that California’s solar policies must evolve to further the clean energy transition without deepening income and racial inequities. Striking this balance will require:

Reforming net metering to lower subsidies for new rooftop solar systems—California already took a first step with its recent “NEM 3.0” update, which lowered export values and introduced new rates.
Promoting community solar and shared renewable projects, so renters and those without suitable roofs can participate and benefit directly.
Protecting early adopters while adjusting incentives for future installations, so today’s solar owners are not penalized retroactively.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Why do non-solar customers have to subsidize solar owners?

A: Because rooftop solar owners offset their power bills and pay less toward shared grid costs, utilities shift the burden of operating expenses onto those remaining full-price customers.

Q: How much does the average non-solar family pay extra per year?

A: State research estimates about $200 per year in added electricity costs per non-solar household.

Q: Does installing rooftop solar always save money?

A: For most owners, yes, especially with incentives. However, savings depend on system size, orientation, usage, and local rates.

Q: Are low-income families eligible for solar help?

A: Yes. Programs like DAC-SASH and the Self-Generation Incentive Program offer special subsidies and grants to qualifying households.

Q: What happens after 2025, when the federal solar tax credit expires?

A: Unless Congress acts, the 30% federal credit vanishes for new installations after December 31, 2025, potentially raising the effective costs of new solar adoption.

Conclusion: The Road Ahead for California’s Energy Equity

California’s venture into distributed rooftop solar is both a climate success and a policy challenge. As non-solar customers foot a growing portion of the bill for those who can afford panels, the urgency for reform grows. A more equitable system will require creative policy, expanded access for disadvantaged groups, and smarter rate structures—ensuring the benefits and costs of a clean energy future are shared by all Californians.

References

Author

medha deb

Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb