A California Family’s Unwanted Impact on Urban Agriculture
Examining how a single real estate deal threatens decades of urban community farming, local heritage, and environmental justice in North Richmond.
In the heart of North Richmond, California, a local family’s real estate decision has set off a cascade of consequences for urban agriculture, environmental justice, and the preservation of community heritage. As city landscapes evolve, the fates of small plots of farmland in vulnerable neighborhoods resonate far beyond property lines, influencing everything from air quality to cultural history.
Urban Agriculture Under Threat in North Richmond
North Richmond has long been both a cradle of community-based food production and a battleground for environmental health. Surrounded by industrial development and burdened by pollution, its residents have relied on local farms like Urban Tilth to access fresh produce, educational opportunities, and green space. But this delicate urban ecosystem now faces new risk: the sale of neighboring farmland for warehouse development, a decision entirely within the legal rights of one California family yet loaded with repercussions for the broader community.
From Flower Nurseries to Fulfillment Centers: A Changing Landscape
For decades, the former Nabeta family property housed greenhouses dating back to the region’s Japanese American flower-farming legacy. The site’s transition from agricultural use to a logistics hub marks not just a change in land use but a rupture in local history. The family, specifically Satoko Nabeta in her 90s, decided to sell the property—her largest asset—in hopes of securing a comfortable retirement. The buyer: a developer intending to replace greenhouses and open fields with a massive distribution warehouse.
- Loss of Open Space: The warehouse threatens the last vestiges of flower-farming history in Richmond.
- Community Conflict: Local activists and preservationists have protested, noting the farm’s importance to ecological and cultural continuity.
- Economic Pressure: With rising property taxes and diminishing agricultural returns, landowners such as Nabeta feel squeezed into selling for development rather than preservation.
Urban Tilth: The Community Farm Next Door
Urban Tilth, the neighboring nonprofit urban farm, has become a linchpin in North Richmond’s effort to improve food security, teach sustainable agriculture, and offer green jobs. Its founder and executive director, Doria Robinson, emphasizes the farm’s dual role as provider and advocate: supplying locally grown produce and resisting the encroachment of industrial land uses that threaten air quality and quality of life for residents.
Urban Tilth and community advocates have lobbied for policy changes and engaged in public demonstration to halt the warehouse development, fearing an influx of truck traffic, further air pollution, and loss of agricultural land in a neighborhood already disproportionately exposed to environmental hazards.
Core Functions of Urban Tilth
- Fresh food access and distribution to North Richmond residents
- Environmental education for local youth and adults
- Ecosystem restoration, including pollinator habitats and soil health
- Community organizing around food justice and land use
Balancing Property Rights and Community Needs
The situation is fraught with conflict, but also empathy. Community organizers say they understand the Nabeta family’s need to retire and secure their financial future. Yet they also argue that allowing property sales to set off a chain reaction of industrial development in a vulnerable neighborhood is shortsighted and unfair.
What others are reading
Key Issues:
- Gentrification and Displacement: Millions of dollars change hands in property sales, yet longtime residents experience the adverse impacts, from declining air quality to the erasure of local history.
- Environmental Justice: North Richmond, already an overburdened community, faces further threats from new industrial hubs, including health issues related to increased diesel exhaust.
- Policy Gaps: Local and regional leadership, though sympathetic to both sides, have limited legal tools to stop one type of development in favor of another if current zoning allows it.
The Role of Local Government
County Supervisor John Gioia has attempted to provide some relief, pushing for a moratorium on new distribution centers and calling attention to the cumulative impacts of truck traffic on air quality. Under this temporary halt, some projects—those already “grandfathered in”—can move forward, while unapproved ones, like the proposal for the Nabeta property, are paused pending further review.
| Proposed Action | Potential Benefit | Potential Drawback |
|---|---|---|
| Moratorium on Distribution Centers | Gives time to assess health and environmental impacts | Reduces immediate development incentives for landowners |
| Re-zoning Agricultural Land | Preserves urban farming and green space | Could limit property values for sellers |
| Land Purchase by Community | Keeps land in agricultural or green use | Requires significant fundraising and willing sellers |
Historic Injustice: Urban Land, Ownership, and Loss
The standoff in North Richmond echoes historic patterns of land loss among marginalized groups—especially immigrants and communities of color. The former flower greenhouse site was a link to the Japanese American history of the region, much of which was displaced during World War II or later lost to economic pressures and redevelopment.
The economic imperative to sell, often heightened by property taxation or inherited debt, is a key mechanism by which urban agricultural land is eroded and food justice advances are reversed. Without systemic protections, even well-meaning families face impossible decisions: sell for development, or risk financial insolvency.
Common Challenges Facing Urban Agriculture:
- High land prices and speculation
- Insufficient legal safeguards for green/open spaces
- Overlapping interests between landowners and community
- Lack of public funding to buy or conserve urban agricultural plots
Community Solutions and Visions for the Future
Despite the odds, local advocates and Urban Tilth have outlined potential solutions:
- Community Land Trusts: Acquiring land collectively to secure its use for farming and community benefit in perpetuity.
- Public and Private Partnership: Mobilizing city, county, or philanthropic funding to purchase at-risk farmland before developers can take over.
- Zoning Reform: Revising city ordinances to limit industrial expansion near residential and community farm areas.
- Education and Outreach: Highlighting the value of urban agriculture for public health, heritage, and ecological sustainability.
Preserving History and Building Resilience
The emotional gravity of the North Richmond standoff is captured in the efforts of Urban Tilth’s leaders, who have tried everything from personal letters to gifts of honey and flowers, hoping to sway the family to sell the property for continued agricultural use. While the Nabeta family remains firm—already under contract with the developer—community members insist that one private sale should not erase a shared legacy or place more burdens on those already overexposed to environmental hazards.
Ultimately, preserving urban agriculture in places like North Richmond will demand both creative organizing and robust policy change. Otherwise, the region risks losing more than green space; it risks erasing living links to heritage, health, and the possibility of future local resilience.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Why is urban agriculture important in communities like North Richmond?
A: Urban agriculture addresses food insecurity, provides green jobs, improves air quality, and cultivates community and ecological health, especially in neighborhoods with few other sources of fresh, affordable produce.
Q: What concerns do residents have about new warehouse developments?
A: Residents fear increased truck traffic, worsened air pollution, the loss of green space, higher noise levels, and negative impacts on health and community character.
Q: Can landowners be prevented from selling to developers?
A: Generally, private landowners have the right to sell to whomever they choose, as long as the proposed land use fits zoning laws. Policy interventions like moratoriums, rezoning, or land trusts are needed to steer outcomes in favor of community interest.
Q: What are land trusts and how do they work in urban settings?
A: Land trusts acquire land with the goal of preserving it for a designated use—such as farming, housing, or conservation—often by holding it in perpetuity on behalf of a community or nonprofit.
Q: How can community members advocate for urban agriculture preservation?
A: Residents can join local advocacy groups, support public policies that prioritize green space, participate in public hearings, and raise awareness of the social, historic, and health benefits of urban farms.
Conclusion: What’s at Stake for Urban Agriculture in California
The North Richmond story stands as a microcosm of challenges and opportunities for urban agriculture nationwide. It spotlights the tension between private property rights and the broader common good. Without coordinated policy solutions and community engagement, the incremental loss of urban farmland is almost certain to continue—alongside the loss of culture, history, and local health that depends upon it.
References
- https://www.kqed.org/news/12012012/a-sonoma-county-ballot-measure-seeks-to-outlaw-big-animal-farms-farmers-say-it-would-be-devastating
- https://www.propublica.org/article/california-farm-families-gained-control-colorado-river
- https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-05-06/questions-of-justice-flare-in-bay-area-warehouse-dispute
- https://perfectunion.us/how-this-billionaire-couple-stole-californias-water-supply/
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
