Why the Building Industry Must Address Embodied Carbon Now
Embodied carbon in construction is the hidden giant accelerating climate change—bold action is now critical, says a new report.
Embodied carbon—the greenhouse gas emissions arising from the manufacture, transportation, installation, maintenance, and disposal of building materials—remains a major but often overlooked contributor to climate change. As global leaders focus on operational emissions from lighting, heating, and cooling, a substantial carbon footprint is embedded in the very walls, roofs, and foundations of our built environment.
Understanding Embodied vs. Operational Carbon
The construction sector’s environmental impact is typically discussed in terms of operational carbon—the emissions from a building’s day-to-day use—but this only captures part of the picture.
Embodied carbon encompasses:
- Material extraction and processing
- Product manufacturing
- Transportation to site
- Construction and installation
- Maintenance, renovation, and end-of-life demolition or recycling
With ever-more efficient buildings, embodied carbon can represent up to half—or more—of a building’s total lifetime emissions.
The Scale of the Problem
Globally, buildings account for nearly 40% of annual carbon dioxide emissions—and embodied carbon constitutes a rapidly growing share.
Recent studies demonstrate:
- New construction could add the equivalent of 230 billion square meters of buildings by 2060—about one New York City every month.
- By 2050, embodied carbon could account for almost half of new built environment emissions if current practices continue.
- Decarbonizing energy supplies alone will not suffice; embodied emissions remain “locked in” as soon as buildings are completed.
The Hidden Impact of Modern Building Materials
The building industry’s reliance on carbon-heavy materials is a silent accelerant of climate change. The main culprits include:
| Material | Global CO2 Contribution | Key Issues |
|---|---|---|
| Cement | ~8% | High energy in calcining limestone, process emissions |
| Steel | ~7-9% | Fossil-fuel powered blast furnaces, mining emissions |
| Aluminum | ~2% | Electricity-intensive refining, bauxite mining |
Innovative alternatives such as cross-laminated timber and low-carbon concretes are gaining traction, but adoption remains slow in the face of cost concerns and entrenched industry habits.
Why Focusing Only on Operational Carbon Is Not Enough
Regulation and green building certification have traditionally centered on reducing operational energy use through better insulation, efficient appliances, and renewable energy. However, a building designed to the highest operational standard may still lock in massive upfront emissions if constructed with conventional materials and methods.
- Operational carbon emissions decline over time as energy grids decarbonize.
- Embodied carbon is emitted immediately—a critical issue when steep emissions cuts are needed in the next decade to stave off worst-case climate scenarios.
Key Findings from Recent Reports
A thorough review synthesizes the conclusions from recent industry and research reports on embodied carbon in construction, including:
- Urgency: The next ten years are pivotal. Rapid emission cuts are required both in operational and embodied sources to keep on track for 1.5°C and 2°C targets.
- Material choices matter: Selection and sourcing of lower-carbon materials can drastically reduce a project’s total footprint.
- Building less, building wisely: Renovation, reuse, and “right-sizing” can eclipse even the greenest new construction when it comes to climate mitigation.
- Policy gaps persist: Regulatory focus is still mainly on operational energy, leaving embodied carbon largely unregulated and unreported.
- Data and transparency: Standardized metrics, reporting tools, and life-cycle analysis are essential to drive progress and accountability.
What others are reading
Case Studies: Building with Low Embodied Carbon
The shift toward low embodied carbon construction is already underway in select projects and the benefits are clear:
- Prefabricated, panelized systems—for example, thick, super-insulated wall panels with dense-pack cellulose—provide high energy performance and drastically cut material and transport emissions.
- Companies integrating education, standardized components, and flexible designs allow for scalable, rapid developments that emphasize both environmental and social responsibility.
- Passive House standards, when paired with low-carbon materials, strike a crucial balance between reduced operational and embodied impacts.
Why the Industry Has Been Slow to Act
The slow uptake of embodied carbon reduction is rooted in several complex factors:
- Lack of awareness: Until recently, most professionals and regulators focused on energy use after completion—neglecting the “built-in” emissions already expended at handover.
- Limited regulations and standards: Few building codes mandate embodied carbon accounting, leaving decisions up to voluntary frameworks or progressive developers.
- Cost and convenience: Carbon-intensive materials and standard practices remain cheaper, more readily available, or familiar, even if low-carbon options would save emissions and money over time.
- Fragmented data: Project teams often lack access to material carbon data or tools to assess trade-offs comprehensively.
- Upfront investment vs. long-term gain: While operational savings accrue over time, embodied emission benefits are “invisible” unless tracked from the outset.
What the Industry Can Do Now
Based on expert recommendations and emerging best practices, actionable steps include:
- Mandating Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for all major new projects
- Prioritizing reuse, retrofitting, and adaptation of existing structures over new builds whenever feasible
- Selecting low-carbon materials (such as recycled steel, wood from certified sources, and alternative concretes)
- Reducing overdesign and unnecessary use of carbon-intensive materials
- Encouraging market innovation and collaboration across the full construction value chain
- Improving transparency through digital tools and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs)
- Educating architects, engineers, contractors, and clients about the climate impact of their choices
Governments and private investors alike have pivotal roles to play in establishing embodied carbon disclosure mandates, incentivizing innovation, and funding research and pilot projects.
Examples of Embodied Carbon Reduction in Practice
Several ongoing initiatives and real-world projects demonstrate the effectiveness and practicality of tackling embodied carbon:
- Panelized Passive House Projects: By delivering super-insulated, airtight panels made with low-carbon materials, these systems simplify construction, reduce waste, and achieve both operational and embodied carbon savings.
- Electric Construction Equipment: Testing of all-electric equipment in collaborative projects (as with Volvo and Skanska’s “Electric Site”) showed a 98% drop in construction-site carbon compared to conventional methods, and proved cost-effective through reduced energy and operator costs.
- Collaborative Efforts: Programs like the Construction Climate Challenge foster cross-industry knowledge sharing, promoting holistic approaches across supply chains and policy frameworks.
Barriers to Change—and How to Overcome Them
Despite clear benefits, multiple hurdles remain:
- Policy inertia: Existing building codes rarely enforce embodied carbon reduction
- Fragmentation: The construction value chain spans numerous actors, complicating system-wide change
- Technical limitations: Need for improved data, digital modeling tools, and validated material alternatives
Overcoming these challenges demands ambitious regulation, sustained public-private partnerships, and a willingness from all industry stakeholders to prioritize climate goals alongside traditional performance and cost metrics.
The Role of Policy and Global Collaboration
Increasingly, both international and local governments are recognizing the need for direct controls on embodied carbon. Effective policy levers include:
- Mandatory embodied carbon reporting for large projects
- Setting maximum carbon intensity standards for key building types
- Incentives and fast-tracking for low-carbon projects
- Support for research and certification schemes for new materials
The World Green Building Council and other collaborative platforms are essential for creating standardized methodologies and sharing best practices worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is embodied carbon, and why does it matter more now than before?
Embodied carbon is the total greenhouse gas emissions associated with building materials and construction processes, released before the building is even used. As operational emissions drop with better efficiency and greener grids, embodied carbon represents a larger share of climate impact and is emitted immediately, influencing the critical emissions cuts science says are needed in the next decade.
How can builders and developers start reducing embodied carbon today?
Key actions include adopting Life Cycle Assessment, choosing materials with documented lower carbon footprints, prioritizing renovation over new builds, and participating in collaborative data-sharing and benchmarking initiatives.
Can new buildings ever be ‘carbon neutral’ considering embodied carbon?
While challenging, buildings can approach net zero by combining low-carbon materials, innovative construction methods, renewable energy use, and offsetting unavoidable emissions. However, the lowest carbon building is almost always the one you don’t build—reusing and upgrading existing structures is often best for the climate.
Is focusing on embodied carbon more expensive for building owners and occupants?
Not necessarily. Though some low-carbon materials may have higher initial costs, many strategies (like reducing overdesign and building smaller) save money. With improved supply chains, regulation, and innovation, costs are likely to fall further.
Key Takeaways
- Embodied carbon is a substantial, urgent source of climate pollution from the built environment.
- Addressing it requires a coordinated response involving material selection, reuse, policy reform, and industry collaboration.
- Tackling embodied carbon now is essential to put the building sector on a 1.5°C-compatible path and avoid locking in massive upfront emissions for decades to come.
- Tools, data, and successful pilot projects already exist; what remains is bold leadership and systemic change at scale.
References
- https://www.bpublicprefab.com/news/treehugger-bpublic-designs-panelized-passive-house-prefabs-building-systems-that-prioritize-sustainability-and-a-reduced-carbon-footprint-yfpbk
- https://worldgbc.org/article/reducing-embodied-carbon-together/
- https://lloydalter.substack.com/p/why-a-symposium-on-embodied-carbon
- https://www.larchlab.com/eliason-on-smart-cities/
- https://www.buildersforclimateaction.org
- http://www.sustainableminds.com/industry-blog/ec3-tool-methodology-not-just-how-but-how-big-can-the-impact-be
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
