Aviation’s Climate Challenge: Two Decades of Missed Targets

How Two Decades of Unmet Goals Are Forcing Aviation to Rethink Climate Action

By Medha deb

Created on Sep 27, 2025

How Two Decades of Unmet Goals Are Forcing Aviation to Rethink Climate Action

For over 20 years, the aviation industry has set ambitious climate targets. Yet, progress has lagged far behind its promises, with emissions rising and sustainability plans underdelivering. This long-term shortfall now threatens both the industry’s social license and the planet’s climate goals.

Global Aviation’s Growing Climate Footprint

Flying is one of the world’s most polluting forms of transport, with emissions increasing sharply over the past few decades. Recent figures reveal:

Aviation contributed around 2% to global CO₂ emissions in 2022, but its share is rising faster than rail, road, or shipping.
Pre-pandemic, international aviation emitted about 600 Mt CO₂ annually, or 1.2% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
Post-pandemic, emissions quickly rebounded; 2022 levels reached nearly 800 Mt CO₂, about 80% of pre-pandemic heights.
Within the EU, aviation accounts for up to 4% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and almost 14% of transport sector emissions, second only to road transport.

Emissions are projected to double or triple by 2050 without stronger action. Despite improved fuel efficiency and new aircraft, passenger demand and flight numbers have outpaced gains, negating overall progress.

The Early Pledges: Ambitious Goals, Weak Delivery

In the 2000s and 2010s, the industry’s largest bodies—most notably the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Air Transport Association (IATA)—set bold climate commitments:

ICAO’s “carbon neutral growth” from 2020: Launched in 2013, this pledged to cap net CO₂ emissions from 2020 onward.
Net zero by 2050: ICAO and IATA now align on a net zero target for 2050.
CORSIA (Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation): ICAO’s global offsetting scheme aims to limit net emissions, though it mainly relies on carbon offsets rather than direct emission reductions.

However, cracks quickly appeared:

These goals often relied on controversial carbon offsetting schemes rather than systemic, real-world emission reductions.
Interim targets and short-term implementation plans were consistently lacking, making accountability difficult.
Non-CO₂ effects—such as NO_x emissions and contrail formation, which can at least double aviation’s total warming impact—were largely overlooked.

Why Have Climate Targets Been Missed?

Despite headline commitments, a raft of industry and governmental failures led to missed targets and rising emissions:

Reliance on Offsets: ICAO’s primary climate strategy, CORSIA, is based on purchasing carbon offsets instead of making real, absolute emissions reductions. This approach is widely criticized for weak criteria, inconsistent enforcement, and questions over additionality of projects.
Limited Scope: Most targets focus just on CO₂, ignoring other gases and high-altitude effects that multiply the industry’s climate impact.
Lack of Binding Regulation: Targets are often aspirational with little regulatory force, allowing for slow implementation and minimal penalties for failure.
No Clear Decarbonization Roadmap: There is ongoing ambiguity over how net zero is to be achieved—technological improvements, shifts in demand, scaling of alternative fuels, or continued offset reliance all remain loosely defined.
Political and Consumer Pressures: Governments are often reluctant to curb aviation growth due to its economic importance; consumers have continued to prioritize the affordability and speed of flying, offsetting climate concerns.

Beyond CO₂: The Neglected Warming Effects of Flying

While CO₂ is the main focus of emissions-reduction plans, research has shown that the actual climate impact of aviation is two to four times higher than just its CO₂ emissions because of:

Nitrogen oxides (NO_x): These react in the atmosphere at altitude, creating ozone and further warming.
Contrail cirrus: Aircraft flying at high altitudes leave behind trails of ice crystals (contrails); under specific conditions, these form cloud cover that traps heat, amplifying greenhouse effects.
Particulate matter and water vapor: Additional airborne emissions alter atmospheric chemistry and contribute further to warming.

One report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded these non-CO₂ impacts accounted for over two-thirds (66%) of aviation’s net climate forcing as of 2018. Despite this, they remain excluded from most industry climate targets.

Pandemic Pause: A Temporary Drop in Emissions

COVID-19 produced an unprecedented drop in air travel, temporarily slashing emissions. However, as travel rapidly resumed, so did the upward trajectory of aviation’s environmental impact:

By 2022, aviation emissions rebounded to 80% of pre-pandemic levels.
Industry projections show that, without fundamental change, air travel will exceed 2019 emissions by as early as 2024 and could more than double by 2050.

Offsetting: The Industry’s Go-To Solution—And Its Limits

The aviation sector’s preferred method to reach ‘carbon neutrality’ or net zero has been to offset emissions by investing in environmental projects elsewhere rather than make radical direct cuts. The CORSIA framework, in particular, allows airlines to buy credits toward reductions rather than reduce their own fuel usage.

However, critics highlight that:

Offsets often fund projects that would have happened anyway, resulting in double-counting or minimal actual climate benefit.
The current offset system does not address non-CO₂ impacts, which are now understood as critical drivers of aviation’s climate footprint.
Long-term reliance on offsetting may delay investment in real technological and operational change.

What Needs to Change? Paths Towards Meaningful Aviation Decarbonization

For the aviation industry to truly align with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C goal, experts call for a suite of coordinated changes:

Set Clear, Binding Emissions Caps: Shift from aspirational to mandatory targets, with interim milestones and strong enforcement.
Address Non-CO₂ Emissions: Include all major greenhouse gases and high-altitude impacts in decarbonization plans.
Scale Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF): Invest in and mandate production and adoption of SAF, which offer lower lifecycle emissions compared to fossil jet fuel, though supply challenges remain.
Revolutionize Aircraft Technology: Accelerate development of efficient engines, lightweight materials, hybrid and electric aircraft, and more efficient flight operations.
Implement Demand Management: Policies to reduce unnecessary flights, support modal shifts to trains for short-haul travel, and encourage videoconferencing for business.
Strong Market Signals: Ending free emissions permits and moving toward auctioning (as the EU plans between 2024 and 2026) to drive investment in low-carbon innovation.

Recent Policy Moves: Are New Rules Enough?

A wave of reforms has been announced, but the gap between promise and practice persists:

The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is being updated to phase out free permits; airlines will see a 25% reduction in free allowances in 2024, halved by 2025, and eliminated by 2026, replaced with auctioning.
Non-CO₂ Reporting: The EU has mandated that airlines begin reporting non-CO₂ impacts starting in 2025, the first major regulatory move to directly address these emissions.

However, these measures are regionally limited and may still unduly rely on offsetting instead of direct emissions reduction. Stronger, globally unified action is still needed.

Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAFs): A Promising but Challenging Solution

Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAFs) are repeatedly hailed as the industry’s most promising lever for decarbonization. SAFs—derived from non-fossil sources such as agricultural waste, used cooking oil, and advanced biofuels—can in principle cut lifecycle emissions by 60-80% compared to conventional kerosene.

Challenges remain:

Current SAFs supply represents
less than 1%
of jet fuel used globally.
Scaling SAFs will require colossal investment, new infrastructure, aviation engine approvals, and substantial support from governments and industry.

Despite this, IATA’s net zero plan still envisions sustainable fuels playing a major role by 2050—but with offsets and technological advances also required to close the gap.

Modest Innovations: Aircraft and Airspace Efficiency

Some short-to-medium term gains can be made via operational and engineering tweaks:

Modernizing fleets with newer, more efficient aircraft types.
Airspace optimization to minimize detours and hold patterns, reducing unnecessary flight times and thus fuel burn.
Eco-design of airports and ground operations to shrink ground-based emissions.

These changes will help, but solely relying on efficiency improvements cannot alone deliver the sector-wide decarbonization needed.

Paris Agreement: Aviation’s Alignment Gap

For aviation to align with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C ceiling:

The sector must reduce CO₂ by at least 90% below 2019 levels by 2050, dropping emissions to just 70 Mt CO₂ globally.
Drastic cuts in non-CO₂ emissions are also essential.
Current international plans suggest emissions will fall only 70% below, or even rise 50% above, 2019 levels by 2050, meaning most scenarios are critically insufficient or off track.

Social License and Future Pressure: Why Aviation Must Act

Public and political scrutiny is mounting. The perception of aviation as a luxury emitter (where frequent flyers drive an outsized share of emissions) is creating new activism and calls for action.

If the industry fails to act, it risks:

Stricter regulation: Including taxes, bans on short-haul flights, limits to airport expansion, and more.
Reputational damage: Growing consumer pressure for greener travel and negative media attention.
Loss of policy support: As policymakers tire of aspirational targets with little progress, subsidies and support could dry up.

Conversely, those players who lead with credible action may secure a long-term future as policymakers and customers alike seek sustainable mobility options.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is the biggest source of aviation’s climate impact?

A: Beyond direct CO₂ emissions, aviation’s non-CO₂ effects—such as nitrogen oxides, water vapor, and contrail cirrus—are responsible for as much as two-thirds of the sector’s total net climate impact.

Q: Why do aviation targets rely so much on offsets?

A: Offsetting is cheaper and easier in the short term than radically remaking operations, but it often achieves little real-world change and fails to address non-CO₂ climate impacts.

Q: Are electric planes or hydrogen flights realistic solutions?

A: Electric and hydrogen planes are in development, but limited by current battery and fuel-cell technology to small aircraft and short flights. Widespread use in large, long-haul jets remains years, if not decades, away.

Q: What can travelers do to reduce their aviation-related emissions?

A: Fly less where possible, choose direct flights, support airlines using sustainable aviation fuels, and consider offsetting only as a complement, not a replacement, to actual emission cuts.

Q: What is the outlook for reaching aviation’s climate goals by 2050?

A: On current trajectories, aviation will miss its net zero by 2050 targets unless there is a dramatic shift towards mandatory cuts, accelerated sustainable fuel adoption, and inclusion of all warming effects—not just CO₂.

References

Author

medha deb

Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb