Australian States Rebrand Shark Attacks: Rethinking Our Relationship With Sharks
Australia is transforming language and policy to reshape public perceptions of sharks and promote coexistence.
Rethinking ‘Shark Attack’: The Language Revolution in Australian Waters
The phrase ‘shark attack’ has long struck fear into the hearts of beachgoers and shaped policy across Australia’s sun-drenched coasts. But in a bold move, multiple Australian states are rebranding their approach to how we talk about—and live alongside—sharks. Driven by fresh scientific understanding, conservation needs, and concerns over sensationalism, officials are shifting towards language such as ‘shark incident’, ‘shark interaction’, ‘shark bite’, and ‘negative encounter’. This change marks a significant pivot in policy and public education efforts, opening up new discussions about how language shapes both our fears and our stewardship of the natural world.
Why Rebrand Shark Attacks?
Shark attacks, though rare in statistical terms, have an outsized presence in Australian popular culture due to their often tragic nature and vivid portrayal in media. The movement to reconsider this terminology isn’t about minimising victim experiences; instead, it’s about addressing outdated perceptions and mitigating unnecessary fear that translates into policies harmful to both sharks and the marine ecosystem.
- Scientific Accuracy: Not all shark-human encounters are attacks; many are investigative bites, bumps, or cases of mistaken identity.
- Reducing Unnecessary Fear: Terms like ‘attack’ imply intent and maliciousness, influencing public attitudes and support for lethal shark control measures.
- Encouraging Conservation: By destigmatizing sharks, marine authorities aim to foster empathy for threatened species and support more balanced management.
- Policy Guidance: Language shapes policy outcomes; neutral terms promote solutions focused on coexistence and risk mitigation instead of eradication.
Origin of the Terminology Shift
This language evolution stems from a collaboration of state governments, such as New South Wales (NSW) and Queensland, and influential organizations like the Australian Marine Conservation Society. The rebranding gained momentum following stakeholder consultations and scientific workshops aimed at improving coexistence between humans and sharks.
According to the Australian Marine Conservation Society, the very word ‘attack’ anthropomorphizes shark behaviour, wrongly attributing intention and malice, which can reinforce negative stereotypes and lead to misguided policy, such as widespread culling.
From ‘Attack’ to ‘Incident’: How the Language Is Changing
The new language is far more nuanced and specific than the one-size-fits-all term ‘attack.’ Here are some of the preferred alternatives now in use by various Australian states and agencies:
- Shark Bite: Used to describe incidents where physical contact and injury occur, regardless of severity.
- Shark Sighting: Used when a shark is simply seen but does not interact with a person.
- Shark Incident or Encounter: Neutral descriptors that include all types of shark-human contact, not necessarily resulting in injury.
- Negative Encounter: Adopted by some authorities to describe any adverse interaction, from a close call to an actual bite.
The decision to replace ‘attack’ with context-dependent terms acknowledges that most interactions are not predatory events but rather exploratory or accidental behaviours.
Scientific Rationale: Understanding Shark Behaviour
Research shows that the vast majority of shark-related incidents do not reflect predatory targeting of humans. Instead, behaviour analyses suggest that sharks may bite humans out of curiosity, in low-visibility situations, or due to mistaken identity—such as confusing a surfer for a seal. This scientific backdrop underlies the push to use language that better reflects the facts:
What others are reading
- Between 1791 and April 2018, Australia reported 1,068 shark attacks, of which 237 were fatal.
- Four species—bull shark, tiger shark, oceanic whitetip, and great white shark—are responsible for the vast majority of fatal interactions.
- Advocates emphasize that the statistical rarity of fatal outcomes supports a move away from alarmist terminology.
The Role of Media and Public Perception
Media reporting has historically inflamed fear through the repeated and dramatic use of the word ‘attack’. This in turn fuels calls for controversial management approaches. Sensational headlines have been cited as contributing to:
- Public Backlash: After high-profile incidents, there is often increased demand for culling or lethal control of sharks.
- Tourism Risks: Fears stoked by language can discourage tourism and affect local economies dependent on coastal recreation.
- Negative Effects on Conservation: Stigmatizing sharks perpetuates mythologies that undermine support for their vital ecological role.
By shifting to neutral, accurate language, officials hope to curb these cycles of fear and negative policy response.
How Policy Is Responding: SharkSmart Management Plans
Language rebranding is only one element of broader reform in shark management. Queensland’s Shark Management Plan 2025–2029, for example, embodies a new strategic vision, integrating:
- Year-round shark control equipment checks and upgrades
- Expansion and adjustment of protected beaches based on population and tourism trends
- Science-based and flexible deployment of gear and technologies
- Regular reviews to adapt to changing patterns of human and shark activity
- Investment in research and trials of non-lethal deterrents and surf zone surveillance(drone use)
- Community education, especially through the SharkSmart initiative, which encourages responsible public behaviour and informed decision-making
The overarching principle is evidence-driven management that ensures coexistence, human safety, and the health of marine ecosystems.
Debate and Criticism: Symbolism vs. Substance
Not everyone agrees on the power or necessity of this semantic change. Critics argue that rebranding ‘shark attack’ is little more than “semantic nonsense” or political window-dressing, skeptical of whether word choice will meaningfully affect deep-seated fears or incident rates. There are also concerns that minimizing the term could downplay victims’ trauma. Importantly, officials note that the rebranding does not diminish the seriousness of injuries and that victim support remains a critical priority.
Comparative Snapshot: Old vs New Terminology
| Old Terminology | New Terminology | Intended Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Shark attack | Shark bite, incident, encounter, negative interaction | Reduces implied malice, encourages accuracy |
| Victim | Person involved | Avoids making individuals seem passive and removes stigma |
| Dangerous predator | Keystone species | Highlights ecological role of sharks |
The Larger Goal: Conservation and Coexistence
A core aim of this communications overhaul is to nurture broad-based support for marine conservation. Sharks are crucial regulators of marine ecosystems, and their decline due to excessive culling or stigma-driven neglect could have a cascade of negative effects. The transition in terminology, therefore, is entwined with efforts to:
- Protect threatened shark species from indiscriminate killing
- Promote science-based coexistence initiatives over lethal control
- Encourage the public to see sharks not just as threats, but as integral members of ocean health
- Support research into effective, humane risk mitigation strategies
What Does the Public Think?
Response to the shift has been mixed, with many conservationists and scientists welcoming a more sophisticated conversation around shark incidents. Some members of the general public, surfers, and victim advocacy groups question whether rebranding will actually address safety or if it will merely “water down” public concern. However, educational programs, such as SharkSmart, are being reinvigorated to explain both the logic and practical value behind the new approach.
Key Advice for Ocean Users
- Stay informed about local shark activity via public alerts and shark sighting apps
- Follow SharkSmart principles—avoid swimming at dawn or dusk, stay in groups, steer clear of large schools of fish
- Support science-driven management and coexistence — discourage calls for culling after high-profile incidents
- Remember: The ocean is a wild, dynamic ecosystem, and living with risk is part of healthy coexistence
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Why are Australian authorities changing the term ‘shark attack’?
A: Authorities believe ‘shark attack’ is misleading and unnecessarily frightening. Most shark-human encounters are not intentional, predatory attacks, and updating language helps reduce stigmatization, support conservation, and promote factual reporting.
Q: Is this rebranding just about language, or does it affect policy?
A: The language shift is part of a larger move towards evidence-based, non-lethal shark management, including education, research into deterrents, improved technology (such as drones), and flexible approaches to shark control.
Q: Will the terminology change help protect sharks?
A: By reducing sensationalism and promoting empathy, the new phrasing aims to decrease public support for lethal population controls and improve outcomes for threatened shark species.
Q: Are shark attacks on the rise in Australia?
A: Numbers fluctuate, and overall risk remains low, but changing patterns in human activity and shark population dynamics have led to a focus on smarter, science-driven coexistence strategies.
Q: How can I stay safe and SharkSmart at the beach?
A: Follow public safety advice, avoid swimming at high-risk times, don’t swim alone, and always listen for local alerts and app updates.
References
- https://stabmag.com/news/australian-authorities-attempt-to-rebrand-shark-attacks-as-negative-encounters-in-an-attempt-to-reduce-fear/
- https://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/news-media/campaigns/sharksmart/program/about/shark-management-plan
- https://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/Work-of-the-Assembly/Tabled-Papers/docs/5825T0546/5825t546.pdf
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shark_attacks_in_Australia
Similar Articles
Read full bio of medha deb
