Sarah Paulson on Aging, Cosmetic Procedures, and Embracing Expression

Sarah Paulson reveals why she embraces aging naturally, rejects Botox, and welcomes the lines life brings.

By Medha deb

Created on Sep 24, 2025

Sarah Paulson reveals why she embraces aging naturally, rejects Botox, and welcomes the lines life brings.

Sarah Paulson on Aging, Botox, and the Beauty of Lines

Sarah Paulson has long captivated audiences with her honest performances and sharp wit. Now at 49, Paulson is once again in the spotlight—this time for her candid perspective on aging, cosmetic procedures like Botox and fillers, and the importance of embracing one’s natural features proudly.

Through interviews and personal anecdotes, Paulson openly celebrates her age and the lines that come with it, offering inspiration in an era dominated by filters and cosmetic enhancements. Here, we untangle her journey, philosophy, and what her openness means for conversations around beauty and self-acceptance in Hollywood and beyond.

The Truth About Her Age: Proud and Unfiltered

Paulson’s age isn’t something she feels the need to conceal. During a lively conversation with friend Pedro Pascal for Interview Magazine, she joked about their experiences with lingering colds, using it as a humorous marker for how “we get sick, then we don’t get well, and then we get sick again.” Paulson playfully concluded, “It’s a testament to our rapid aging.” Her lack of reticence is striking in an industry that prizes youth; she proclaims, “I’m happy to say [my age],” referencing her 49th year with pride.

This candidness in stating her age is not an act of defiance—it’s a gesture of normalization, pushing back against the notion that aging is to be hidden or danced around.

Rejecting Cosmetic Procedures: Botox and Fillers

Unlike many of her peers, Paulson chooses to forgo Botox, fillers, or other injectables to alter her appearance. In her words: “I don’t shoot anything into my face.” For Paulson, visible lines and changes in skin are evidence of a life well lived and emotions fully experienced.

Even as she acknowledges the pressure to look perpetually youthful, particularly given her visibility, Paulson opts for authenticity. She jokes, “Well, since I don’t shoot anything into my face at this particular juncture, I imagine everyone knows I’m 49,” hinting at the transparency naturally provided by her appearance.

Paulson’s Approach: No Botox, no fillers, no touch-ups—just wholehearted acceptance.
Reasoning: A desire to maintain range of expression and to eschew the idea that aging is something shameful or to be hidden.
Perspectives on the Future: Paulson leaves the door open for change, recognizing that personal decisions can evolve with time. “You never know how you’ll feel at a later date.”

Onstage Aging: Theater, Expression, and New Lines

Currently starring in the Broadway play Appropriate, Paulson finds her work in theater invigorating but physically taxing on her appearance. She remarks, “If there’s anything that’s going to age me rapidly, it’s going back to theater.” The reason? Live theater demands a constant range of expressions, magnifying every nuance and wrinkle.

Paulson describes standing backstage and realizing, “I’m making these facial expressions multiple times a day all day for months on end. I’ve never had those lines in between my eyebrows. Well, I expect when I’m done with this play, they’ll be there permanently.” Her matter-of-fact acceptance of these changes is refreshing; instead of resenting them, she sees them as part of the ongoing narrative of her life and career.

The Benefit of Movement: Why She Won’t Freeze Her Face

Paulson underscores the importance of movement for actors. Expressiveness is her craft, and anything that restricts genuine feeling—like injectables—stands in opposition to her artistic values. This aligns her with other actors who refuse Botox to maintain full emotive range:

Sarah Jessica Parker has expressed a similar philosophy, citing the role facial movement plays in conveying emotion on screen and stage.
Jennifer Aniston and Drew Barrymore have also spoken out about their decisions to avoid facial injectables in favor of authenticity and long-term well-being.

Paulson’s approach highlights the tension between Hollywood’s expectations and the realities of nuanced performance. For her, the lines between her eyebrows are not marks to eradicate—they’re testimony to the roles she has inhabited and the emotions she has poured into her work.

Conversations with Peers: Humor, Honesty, and Shared Experience

The Interview Magazine discussion with Pedro Pascal turns into a meditative (and at times, amusing) exchange about aging. While Paulson claims her truth with humor and candor, Pascal reveals a different perspective, jokingly stating he isn’t quite as ready to name his age with pride.

This back-and-forth humanizes both actors while exposing the sometimes conflicting feelings even the most successful people have about getting older.

Public Response: Embracing Authentic Beauty

Paulson’s transparent attitude toward aging and cosmetic procedures has sparked significant public conversation. In a world saturated with filtered images and smoothed-over faces, her willingness to embrace natural lines, laugh lines, and even the ‘11s’ between her brows stands out as a defiant act of self-acceptance.

Social media reactions praise her for honesty and for reducing some of the pressure everyday people feel about looking ageless.
Industry voices point out that Paulson looks “great for her age”—a compliment she takes with a grain of salt, reflecting on how such comments betray our deeper discomfort with aging.
The conversation widens to include others in her generation—often overlooked in the age debate—and underscores the importance of diverse representations of beauty and aging.

The Broader Impact: Rethinking Aging in Hollywood

Paulson’s message resonates at a time when Hollywood is reassessing its beauty standards. For generations, actresses have felt immense pressure to “stay young”—sometimes at the cost of expression, self-esteem, and even health. Paulson’s refusal to “shoot anything into [her] face” becomes more than a personal choice; it signals a broader shift.

Changing the Narrative: Her story pushes back against the notion that a woman’s worth or relevance is tied to youth.
Empowerment: By speaking out, Paulson offers permission for others—whether public figures or not—to age joyfully and on their own terms.
Cultural Reflection: The enthusiasm for Paulson’s openness reflects a growing appetite for realness and relatability, especially in beauty and lifestyle media.

What Paulson’s Story Means for Others

Topic	Paulson’s Perspective	Wider Implications
Aging	Proudly states her age, doesn’t try to hide it	Encourages cultural acceptance of aging as natural
Botox and Fillers	Chooses not to use them—for now	Prompting dialogue about the pressure to use injectables
Facial Lines	Accepts new lines from expressive roles	Challenges stigma around visible signs of aging
Hollywood Standards	Pushes for authenticity and range of expression	Sparks industrywide rethink about beauty ideals

Celebrity Allies: Natural Aging in the Spotlight

Sarah Jessica Parker: Celebrates movement and the power of authentic emotion (“I have to move my eyebrows… meant to be sharing emotion”).
Jamie Lee Curtis: Warns against procedures, citing her own negative experiences (“The current trend of fillers and procedures… are wiping out generations of beauty”).
Jennifer Aniston: Advocates for “no-tox”—grateful to learn from mistakes made by others.
Drew Barrymore: Steers clear of injections, saying she wants to avoid repeating her addictive past (“Never say never,” but prefers not to).

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Why does Sarah Paulson avoid Botox and fillers?

A: Paulson wants to maintain her full range of facial expression as an actor and feels strongly about embracing the natural process of aging, including the visible lines that result from emoting on stage and in life.

Q: Could Paulson consider cosmetic procedures in the future?

A: She acknowledges that people can change their minds and leaves open the possibility that she may feel differently at some point, but for now she is comfortable with natural aging.

Q: What impact does performing in theater have on her appearance?

A: Theater requires repetitive, intense facial expressions, which Paulson says might leave her with new “lines between [her] eyebrows” by the end of the run. She accepts these as part of her life and craft.

Q: How has the public responded to Paulson’s transparency?

A: The response has been overwhelmingly positive, with many praising her for promoting confidence, reducing shame around aging, and making it easier for others to accept their own changes.

Key Takeaways: Aging Authentically and Redefining Beauty

Sarah Paulson’s perspective on aging centers on authenticity, expression, and self-acceptance.
Her refusal to use Botox or fillers supports a growing movement of celebrities choosing natural aging over cosmetic enhancement.
Paulson’s openness invites important conversations about beauty standards, industry expectations, and the value of realness both on and off the stage.
Her story encourages individuals to see lines, changes, and age as testaments to life’s richness, not as flaws to be hidden.

As the conversation about aging in Hollywood continues to evolve, figures like Sarah Paulson play a crucial role in normalizing the truth that beauty is not about erasure but about embracing who we are—at every stage, and with every line.

References

Author

medha deb

Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb