QVC Under Fire: The Outcry Over Mocking a Model’s Natural Hair
QVC faces backlash after hosts mock a Black model's natural hair on live TV, prompting social media outrage and a broader discussion about representation.
QVC Hosts’ Comments on Natural Hair: The Spark That Lit the Debate
In January 2015, QVC, a major American shopping network, became the focus of heated public scrutiny after a live segment aired in which two hosts commented on, and appeared to mock, a Black model’s natural hair. The incident struck a nerve, resonating far beyond its initial broadcast and igniting a passionate conversation about professional conduct, racial sensitivity, and the enduring stigmatization of natural Black hairstyles on national television.
What Happened During the QVC Live Segment?
The incident took place as the QVC hosts were presenting a Dooney & Bourke handbag. The model showcasing the product, Michelle, wore her natural curls in a voluminous, loose Afro style. During the demonstration, one host remarked, “You might look back and think, ‘Why’d I wear my hair like that?’ but you’ll still like your purse.” Her co-host added, “That’s right. You won’t look at your hair in the picture; you’ll look at your handbag.” Camera cuts made it clear that the conversation was happening while Michelle’s natural hair was on display, linking the comment directly to her appearance.
- Insensitive Timing: The hosts’ exchange coincided directly with footage of Michelle’s natural Afro, causing many viewers to interpret the comments as an insult to her hair.
- On-Air Laughter: The hosts chuckled after the remarks, adding to the perception that Michelle’s hairstyle was the butt of the joke.
The segment quickly went viral, drawing criticism across multiple social platforms for what was widely viewed as demeaning and racially insensitive commentary toward a Black woman wearing her natural hair. Many believed it perpetuated harmful biases about textured hair and Black beauty standards.
The Rapid Social Media Backlash
Almost immediately, viewers and advocates for natural hair began to circulate video clips of the segment and express outrage using hashtags and direct commentary. Notably, bloggers and social media figures such as L.A. Moore (of Bougie Black Girl) amplified the incident, encouraging others to contact QVC and demand accountability. The issue quickly reached mainstream awareness, fueled by a strong sense of déjà vu regarding cultural insensitivity toward Black hair in the beauty and fashion industries.
- Viral Video Clips: Social networks, especially Twitter and Instagram, saw rapid dissemination of the segment, with users denouncing QVC’s hosts and the company itself.
- Blogger Mobilization: Influencers and bloggers wrote open letters and rallied their followers to amplify their dismay and seek an apology.
- Outrage Rooted in Experience: Many commentators noted this was only the latest in a series of microaggressions faced by Black models, consumers, and employees in public-facing media.
Key Quotes From Social Reaction
- “Why is Black hair—when it’s natural—such a talking point for ridicule in the media?”
- “These women need to know the power of their words and the importance of representation.”
- “QVC, do better. A large portion of your audience supports and celebrates natural hair.”
Host Apology: Sincere or Strategic?
Following the explosive reaction online, one of the QVC hosts involved, Sandra Bennett, offered a public apology. Her statement, initially posted on Facebook and later reported by various outlets, included:
“I made a comment along the lines of when you carry a Dooney, you look good even if you don’t do your hair. It was meant to be lighthearted, but in the middle of my comment, the camera cut to Michelle, an African American model. I want to be clear that I was in no way talking about her… It was just terrible timing.”
What others are reading
Bennett detailed that she did not realize how the comment appeared until she reviewed viewer reactions and was informed of the controversy. She stated that she called Michelle, the model, to apologize directly and asserted that Michelle was not aware of the issue before their conversation. Many viewers, including the outspoken blogger L.A. Moore, accepted the apology on the surface, but lingering doubts remained among critics—especially after Bennett deleted the conversation from Twitter.
- Direct Apology: The host reached out personally to Michelle and posted a public statement of regret.
- Perception Management: Bennett emphasized her lack of intent and professed she was “mortified” by the impression her words gave.
- Skepticism: Some questioned the timing and authenticity, especially after the online apology thread disappeared, suggesting strategic damage control over genuine understanding.
Why the QVC Incident Resonated
The broader reaction to the QVC segment was not only about a single comment but about larger issues of race, representation, and respect in mainstream beauty and media. Black women, in particular, saw the incident as symptomatic of deeper biases that have long influenced both workplace and consumer culture. The minimization and ridicule of natural hair, especially in public or professional spaces, remains a deeply personal and contentious subject.
Societal Impact and Historical Context
- Longstanding Stereotypes: Natural Black hairstyles have commonly been marginalized or portrayed as unprofessional, leading women to face both implicit and explicit pressure to conform to Eurocentric standards.
- Valuing Authenticity: The natural hair movement encourages women to embrace their authentic selves and reject outdated prejudices; the QVC incident was viewed as an affront to this progress.
- Corporate Responsibility: Viewers insisted that companies benefiting from diverse clientele must also respect and accurately represent all forms of beauty.
For many, the QVC controversy was not an isolated event, but part of a recurring pattern in which Black women’s features—especially their hair—are held up for unwanted scrutiny and commentary.
How QVC and Dooney & Bourke Responded
QVC, which sells beauty, fashion, and lifestyle products to a broad, diverse customer base, found itself in an uncomfortable spotlight. Some consumers threatened to boycott both QVC and its business partners, notably handbag designer Dooney & Bourke, unless the companies addressed the situation with meaningful action.
- Official Response: QVC publicly apologized and indicated that the incident did not reflect its values, though more specific measures or follow-up diversity training were not made public at the time.
- Blogger and Customer Reactions: Many expressed that while an apology was necessary, there also needed to be visible efforts to foster inclusivity and cultural sensitivity on air.
- Brand Association: Some questioned whether business partners, such as Dooney & Bourke and Black-owned brands like Carol’s Daughter (which exclusively offers hair and body products via QVC), would continue to work with the network unless broader diversity efforts were demonstrated.
The Role of Social Media: Amplification and Accountability
Social media played a pivotal role in propelling the QVC incident from a moment of discomfort on live TV to a nationwide conversation about inclusivity and media responsibility. Videos, hashtags, and commentary posts enabled viewers to share their outrage, educate others about Black hair issues, and pressure QVC to respond. Bloggers like Bougie Black Girl harnessed these platforms—posting original content and encouraging direct action, such as emailing complaints and posting about the episode on brand channels.
- Viral Spread: The speed at which the video and related conversations spread highlighted both the vigilance of the natural hair community and the importance of social platforms in activism.
- Demand for Transparency: Viewers called for clear policies to address similar issues in the future and for hosts to undergo cultural competence training.
- Community Support: Many commenters reinforced the importance of positive natural hair representation and openly commended the model’s beauty and professionalism.
Media Coverage Highlights
Several prominent online outlets covered the incident, echoing and analyzing the public response. Perspectives varied, but common themes emerged around professionalism, unintended harm, and the need for industry self-reflection.
| Publication | Core Message |
|---|---|
| Cosmopolitan | Documented the incident and the ensuing debate about natural hair stigmas on television. |
| Black Enterprise | Reported on both the backlash and the hosts’ apologies, focusing on the significance for African-American consumers. |
| NewsOne | Emphasized the pattern of cultural insensitivity regarding Black hair in mainstream media. |
| Black Hair Information | Explored the role of brands and demanded corporate accountability for reinforcing outdated stereotypes. |
Lessons Learned and Moving Forward
The controversy signaled the necessity for greater sensitivity in live media. It prompted both companies and individuals to reflect on how unintended words and actions can reinforce systemic biases, and underscored the influence that public feedback can have in shaping brands’ response to cultural missteps.
Key takeaways for media and brands include:
- Diversity & Inclusion Training: Regular, comprehensive education for on-air personalities to prevent insensitive or inadvertently harmful remarks.
- Accountability: Willingness to acknowledge mistakes, issue sincere apologies, and take tangible steps toward improvement.
- Celebrating All Beauty: Genuine efforts to feature diverse models, styles, and narratives—without resorting to caricature or ridicule.
- Open Dialogue: Maintaining clear and responsive channels for feedback so that issues can be reported and resolved efficiently.
The Importance of Positive Representation
Experiences like the one on QVC serve as crucial reminders of the impact that media figures and corporations have on cultural perceptions. When Black women and girls see their natural hair celebrated, not mocked or minimized, it sends a broader message of acceptance—helping combat long histories of marginalization.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: What exactly did the QVC hosts say about the model’s hair?
A: During a live segment, a QVC host remarked, “You might look back and think, ‘Why’d I wear my hair like that?’ but you’ll still like your purse,” directly after which the camera cut to an African-American model wearing her natural curls. Many interpreted the exchanges as mocking the model’s hairstyle.
Q: How did the QVC host respond to the backlash?
A: The host, Sandra Bennett, issued a public apology on social media and called the model to apologize personally, stating that her comment was not intended as an insult and regretting how it appeared to viewers.
Q: What was the reaction from the natural hair community and viewers?
A: The natural hair community and many viewers expressed outrage and disappointment, spreading the video on social media and calling for better representation and sensitivity from QVC and its hosts. Many demanded not only apologies but also actionable changes to prevent similar incidents.
Q: Did QVC take any other steps aside from issuing an apology?
A: Beyond the apologies from the host and QVC, there were no specifics disclosed about internal changes, diversity training, or further commitments made public at the time. The effectiveness and sincerity of the response remained points of debate.
Q: Why do discussions about Black women’s natural hair elicit such strong reactions?
A: For many, natural hair represents not just a style but a core aspect of cultural identity and autonomy. Derision or misunderstanding of natural hair taps into deep-seated issues of racial bias, representation, and ongoing efforts to challenge Eurocentric beauty standards.
Final Thoughts: Culture, Accountability, and Progress
The QVC natural hair controversy stands as a watershed moment in the continuing struggle for authentic representation and respect in the beauty and media industries. The incident revealed the risk of unintentional harm in live media, the power of collective action online, and the ongoing need for true inclusion in how products—and people—are presented to the world. As the conversation continues, it offers a valuable opportunity for individuals and brands alike to learn, grow, and champion beauty in all its natural, diverse forms.
References
- https://www.blackenterprise.com/qvc-host-mocks-natural-models-hair-issues-apology/
- https://newsone.com/3087449/qvc-natural-hair-model-insulted-on-air/
- https://blackhairinformation.com/general-articles/opinion/im-stunned-qvc-dooney-bourke-reps-laughing-womans-natural-hair/
- https://www.cosmopolitan.com/style-beauty/beauty/news/a35729/qvc-makes-fun-of-models-natural-hair/
- https://organixlocs.com/qvc-host-deletes-twitter-apology-about-curly-haired-model-comment/
- http://www.naturalhaircarenews.com/2015/01/31/video-was-it-a-really-bad-camera-timing-or-was-qvc-hosts-mocking-natural-hair-model/
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
