Dyson Airwrap vs Shark FlexStyle: Full Comparison of the Ultimate Multi-Stylers

A detailed, side-by-side review of the Dyson Airwrap and Shark FlexStyle to help you choose the best hair styling tool for your needs.

By Medha deb
Created on

Dyson Airwrap vs Shark FlexStyle: The Ultimate Head-to-Head Comparison

If you’re searching for the perfect multi-purpose hair tool, you’ve likely come across two major contenders: the Dyson Airwrap and the Shark FlexStyle. Both promise to dry, curl, smooth, and add body to your hair while minimizing heat damage and reducing styling time. But with significant differences in price, attachments, design, and performance, which one is truly worth your investment?

This comprehensive guide covers every aspect of the Dyson Airwrap and Shark FlexStyle, drawing on user experiences, expert opinions, and detailed specs to help you find your best match. We’ll break down each tool by design, performance, attachments, results, and much more—right down to price and FAQ.

What Are the Dyson Airwrap and Shark FlexStyle?

Both the Dyson Airwrap and Shark FlexStyle are multi-styling tools designed to give salon-level results at home. Utilizing powerful airflow and advanced attachments, they allow you to achieve bouncy curls, sleek blowouts, smooth finishes, and voluminous styles—all with less heat and faster styling times compared to traditional hot tools.

  • Dyson Airwrap: Known for its engineering, innovative attachments, and premium price tag. The Airwrap features a sleek wand-like design and a range of interchangeable styling heads.
  • Shark FlexStyle: A more budget-friendly alternative offering flexibility, high power, and its own collection of styling tools. The FlexStyle stands out for its ability to transform from a straight wand to an L-shaped dryer.

Quick Comparison Table: Dyson vs. Shark

FeatureDyson AirwrapShark FlexStyle
Price~$599~$299
Attachments Included6 (Curl barrels x2, smoothing brushes x2, round brush, filter cleaner, smoothing dryer)5 (Auto-wrap curlers, paddle brush, oval brush, concentrator, diffuser*)
Weight1.5 lbs1.54 lbs
Heat Settings3 + cool shot3 + cool shot
Max Heat194°F203°F
Noise84 dB95 dB
Suction/Air FlowModerateStronger
Notable AttachmentDefrizzing tool (highly praised)Brushes and curlers with strong air flow
StorageLuxury case includedBasic storage, case available separately

Ergonomics & Design

Comfort plays a huge role in daily styling. Here’s how these tools compare:

  • Dyson Airwrap: Slightly lighter with a longer cord, designed for easy one-handed use. All controls and settings are grouped in one area, making it simple to change settings without shifting your grip.
  • Shark FlexStyle: Only marginally heavier, but features a transformative design that bends to act like a classic hair dryer. However, certain settings (like the cool shot) require two hands to operate, and buttons rely on indicator lights rather than touch or position—adding a learning curve, especially when styling the back of your head.

Key Pros & Cons

  • Dyson Pro: Controls are ergonomic and intuitive, heat/airflow can be toggled by feel.
  • Shark Pro: L-shaped design is better for traditional blow-drying. Strong air suction grips hair quickly.

Attachments and Customization

Attachments are one of the most important differences:

  • Dyson Airwrap comes standard with:
    • Two airwrap curling barrels (change direction with knob)
    • Firm and soft smoothing brushes
    • Round volumizing brush
    • Smoothing dryer attachment (acts as pre-styler and defrizzing tool)
    • Filter cleaning brush
    • Deluxe storage case
  • Shark FlexStyle includes:
    • Two auto-wrap curlers (you must switch barrels for left/right curls)
    • Paddle brush
    • Oval brush
    • Concentrator nozzle (classic blow dryer style)
    • Diffuser (ideal for curly or wavy hair)

The range of attachments means both tools can be tailored to suit different hair types and styling needs, though the process for switching curl direction is more seamless on the Airwrap.

Drying Power & Air Flow

Shark FlexStyle is recognized for its powerful air flow and suction, which helps grab hair quickly and can dry thicker hair faster. The strong suction is particularly appreciated for styling curls or quickly rough-drying hair before smoothing. Dyson Airwrap has moderate air flow, but remains gentle and reliable—protecting hair from excessive force and tangling.

Heat Settings, Heating Power & Hair Protection

Both aim to minimize heat damage with intelligent temperature control and multiple heat settings. However, the Shark FlexStyle does have a higher maximum heat (203°F vs. Dyson’s 194°F). This provides more versatility when extra heat is needed, but both allow you to select lower heat for regular use.

Noise Level

If you’re sensitive to sound, note that the Dyson Airwrap operates at a lower 84 dB—about as loud as a running dishwasher (bearable in most households). The Shark FlexStyle is louder at 95 dB, approaching the volume of a passing motorcycle, which could be a decisive factor for noise-averse users or shared living spaces.

Styling Results: What Can Each Do?

Both tools excel at creating a range of styles, but a few differences stand out:

  • Curling: Both can produce bouncy, defined curls. The Dyson’s barrels allow for easier directional changes mid-style, while the Shark requires swapping barrels—but compensates with stronger suction.
  • Smoothing: The Dyson’s smoothing/defrizzing tool is highly praised for making hair glossy and sleek. The Shark’s smoothing attachment is decent, but less effective for significant frizz.
  • Drying: The Shark, thanks to its L-shaped design and powerful air flow, excels in traditional blow-drying and rough-drying larger sections of hair. Curly hair users rave about the Shark’s diffuser, which the Dyson lacks in the core kit.

Price & Value

Dyson Airwrap is an investment at around $599, while the Shark FlexStyle is typically half that at $299. While both reside in the “luxury styling tool” category, the Shark stands out for affordability, particularly for those new to multi-stylers or looking for a secondary tool. The Dyson’s price accounts for premium build, engineering, and greater attachment versatility.

Ease of Use & Learning Curve

The Dyson Airwrap has a minimal learning curve: its user-friendly buttons, intuitive attachments, and directional control make it easy for beginners and daily use. Shark FlexStyle has a steeper learning curve mainly because of attachment switching and less-tactile controls, but becomes natural with use. Both tools benefit from watching a few technique tutorials.

Hair Type Suitability

  • Straight/Fine Hair: Both work well, but Dyson’s lower heat and anti-frizz attachments better protect delicate hair.
  • Thick/Coarse Hair: Shark’s higher heat and stronger air flow can dry and style dense hair faster.
  • Curly/Wavy Hair: Shark’s included diffuser makes it a standout for natural curls, while Dyson is best for smoothing and blowouts, especially with the defrizzing tool.

Which Styler Is Best For You?

Your optimal choice depends on your budget, hair type, and everyday styling habits. Here’s a quick summary:

  • Dyson Airwrap:
    • Best for: Versatility, lower noise, anti-frizz results, a smooth learning curve, premium engineering, and salons/enthusiasts who want every styling option.
    • Willingness to invest more for long-term quality and options.
  • Shark FlexStyle:
    • Best for: Power, faster drying, affordability, curly hair (with diffuser), and those wanting strong performance with a friendlier price tag.
    • Anyone looking for a starter multi-styler or a solid performer without a luxury markup.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Which styler is better for curly hair?

A: The Shark FlexStyle is generally preferred by curly-haired users due to its included diffuser and the flexibility of the L-shaped design for drying curls. The Dyson Airwrap, especially with its smoothing and curling attachments, is better for creating smooth finishes and defined waves.

Q: Is there a significant difference in heat damage?

A: Both tools use intelligent heat control to minimize hair damage. The Dyson runs slightly cooler, making it safer for very fine or fragile hair. The Shark gets hotter, offering more power for frizz control or thick hair, but may dry finer hair faster with more risk of over-drying if not monitored.

Q: Which tool is louder?

A: The Shark FlexStyle is noticeably louder (about 95 dB vs. Dyson’s 84 dB). If noise is a concern, especially in close quarters or shared living, the Dyson is quieter and less likely to disturb others.

Q: What comes in each box?

A: The Dyson Airwrap kit includes six attachments and a luxury case. The Shark FlexStyle kit offers five core attachments; additional attachments can be bought separately. Always check the package contents before purchasing, as sets can vary.

Q: Is the Dyson Airwrap worth the price premium?

A: The Airwrap’s higher price reflects its innovative engineering, advanced anti-frizz features, quieter operation, and premium build. It’s ideal for users who style their hair daily or want every available option. The Shark FlexStyle offers powerful performance at a more accessible price and is a strong choice for those wanting advanced features without the Dyson investment.

Final Verdict: Which to Choose?

If you value versatility, want the best anti-frizz technology, and enjoy premium build quality and quiet operation, the Dyson Airwrap justifies its price. If affordability, fast drying, or curly-hair functionality are highest on your list—and you can handle a bit more noise—the Shark FlexStyle is a top-tier alternative offering remarkable performance at a lower price point.

For most users, both deliver noticeable improvements over conventional styling tools. Consider your hair’s needs—and your budget—before committing to your new styling sidekick.

Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb